ReviewCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2017
Endoscopic Management of Benign Esophageal Ruptures and Leaks.
Review in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Successful Multidisciplinary Management of Esophageal Perforation Complicated by Septic Shock: A Race Against Time.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- Endoscopic treatment of gastrointestinal perforations and leaks: Why, when, and how?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026Review
- Beware the Hole: A Trick for Endoscopic Success while Closing an Esophageal Perforation.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for the Treatment of Leak After Oncologic Gastroesophageal Surgery: A Cohort Study.Reviews on recent clinical trials · 2025Article
- Successful Treatment of Fishbone-Induced Esophageal Perforation and Mediastinal Abscess: A Case Report and Literature Review.The American journal of case reports · 2023Review
- Successful Endoscopic Closure of Esophageal Perforation in Boerhaave Syndrome Using the Over-the-Scope Clip.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Endoscopic Management of Postoperative Esophageal and Upper GI Defects-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Technical Review on Endoscopic Treatment Devices for Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Postsurgical Leaks.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2023Review
- Risk factors for the poor prognosis of Benign esophageal perforation: 8-year experience.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Minimally Invasive and Endoscopic Approach to Esophageal Perforation.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2022Article
- International multicenter expert survey on endoscopic treatment of upper gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks.Endoscopy international open · 2019Article
- Endoscopic repair of spontaneous esophageal rupture during gastroscopy: A CARE compliant case report.Medicine · 2018Article
- Esophageal leaks: I thought that glue was not effective.Endoscopy international open · 2018Article
- Treatment of benign perforations and leaks of the esophagus: factors associated with success after stent placement.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Article
- Minimally invasive management of esophageal perforation.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementEsophageal leaks (EL) and ruptures (ER) are rare conditions associated with a high risk of mortality and morbidity. Historically, EL and ER have been surgically treated, but current treatment options also include conservative management and endoscopy. Over the last decades, interventional endoscopy has evolved as an effective and less invasive alternative to primary surgery in these cases. A variety of techniques are currently available to re-establish the continuity of the digestive tract, prevent or treat infection related to the leak/rupture, prevent further contamination, drain potential collections, and provide nutritional support. Endoscopic options include clips, both through the scope (TTS) and over the scope (OTS), stent placement, vacuum therapy, tissue adhesive, and endoscopic suturing techniques. Theoretically, all of these can be used alone or with a multimodality approach. Endoscopic therapy should be combined with medical therapy but also with percutaneous drainage of collections, where present. There is robust evidence suggesting that this change of therapeutic paradigm in the form of endoscopic therapy is associated with improved outcome, better quality of life, and shortened length of hospital stay. Moreover, recent European guidelines on endoscopic management of iatrogenic perforation have strengthened and to some degree regulated and redefined the role of endoscopy in the management of conditions where there is a breach in the continuity of the GI wall. Certainly, due to the complexity of these conditions and the variety of available treatment options, a multidisciplinary approach is strongly recommended, with close clinical monitoring (by endoscopists, surgeons, and intensive care physicians) and special attention to signs of sepsis, which can lead to the need for urgent surgical management. This review article will critically discuss the literature regarding endoscopic modalities for esophageal leak and perforation management and attempt to place them in perspective for the physician.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28508384What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.