Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28508119›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2017

Lipoprotein(a): A Lipoprotein Whose Time Has Come.

Erik Kelly, Linda Hemphill

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erik KellyDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Linda HemphillDivision of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. LHEMPHILL@PARTNERS.ORG.
Massachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementCardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the USA and around the world. While we are now able to achieve significant low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering with current therapies, many patients remain at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been shown to be an independent risk factor for CVD and accounts for some of the residual CVD risk after LDL-C lowering in several large clinical trials. Moreover, there is now strong evidence supporting the causal relationship between Lp(a) and aortic stenosis as well as peripheral arterial disease. Despite the growing interest in this lipoprotein, the current therapeutic options for Lp(a) reduction are limited. Our general approach in patients with elevated Lp(a) levels is to aggressively manage other modifiable cardiovascular risk factors including lifestyle modification, consideration of aspirin therapy, and LDL-C lowering. Unfortunately, there are conflicting reports on how effective this strategy is at reducing the risk for cardiovascular events attributed to elevated Lp(a). As a result, targeted Lp(a)-lowering strategies are needed. Lp(a) therapeutics is an active area of research with several promising classes of pharmacotherapies under investigation to address this causal biomarker.

Indexed as

Aortic stenosisCardiovascular riskLipid screeningLipid therapiesLipoprotein(a)

Identifiers

PMID28508119
OpenAlexW2614686622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.