ArticleNeurology. Genetics2017
Intragenic
Article in Neurology. Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Congenital myasthenic syndromes.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2019Pooled it
- EDIR: exome database of interspersed repeats.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- A novelHeliyon · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo identify the genetic cause in a patient affected by ptosis and exercise-induced muscle weakness and diagnosed with congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) using whole-genome sequencing (WGS).
methodsCandidate gene screening and WGS analysis were performed in the case. Allele-specific PCR was subsequently performed to confirm the copy number variation (CNV) that was suspected from the WGS results.
resultsIn addition to the previously reported frameshift mutation c.1124_1127dup, an intragenic 6,261 bp deletion spanning from the 5' untranslated region to intron 2 of the
conclusionsWe report a CMS case with identification of the breakpoints of the intragenic
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.