Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28508069›Full record

ArticleScience advances2017

High-predation habitats affect the social dynamics of collective exploration in a shoaling fish.

Christos C Ioannou, Indar W Ramnarine, Colin J Torney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
20.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Challenges of mismatching timescales in longitudinal studies of collective behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Behavioral traits that define social dominance are the same that reduce social influence in a consensus task.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christos C IoannouSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-9739-889X
Indar W RamnarineDepartment of Life Sciences, University of the West Indies at St. Augustine, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
Colin J TorneySchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QW, U.K.
University of Bristol · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of the West Indies · TT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collective decisions play a major role in the benefits that animals gain from living in groups. Although the mechanisms of how groups collectively make decisions have been extensively researched, the response of within-group dynamics to ecological conditions is virtually unknown, despite adaptation to the environment being a cornerstone in biology. We investigate how within-group interactions during exploration of a novel environment are shaped by predation, a major influence on the behavior of prey species. We tested guppies (

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsEcosystemPoeciliaPredatory BehaviorRiskRiversSocial Behaviorcollective behaviourcross-populationfollowersGroup decision makingguppyinitiatorsleadershippredationself-organisation

Identifiers

PMID28508069
PMCPMC5415332
OpenAlexW2609443184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.