Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28507745›Full record

ReviewUnited European gastroenterology journal2017

Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.

Michal F Kaminski, Siwan Thomas-Gibson, Marek Bugajski, Michael Bretthauer, Colin J Rees, Evelien Dekker, Geir Hoff, Rodrigo Jover, Stepan Suchanek, Monika Ferlitsch and 19 more

5 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in United European gastroenterology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 101 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03816774 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Adding Simethicone to a Split Regimen of Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Preparation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Colonoscopy Setting: an Endoscopist-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPortuguese Oncology Institute, CoimbraRan2019 to 2022Enrolled412ConditionsColo-rectal Cancer, Colonic NeoplasmsArmsPEG split-dose and simethicone
NCT04482452 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Percentage Visualized Mucosa as a Marker for the Quality of Colonoscopy

TypeobservationalSponsorInsel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernRan2020 to 2022Enrolled500ConditionsColonoscopyArmsColonoscopy
NCT04749277 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Artificial Intelligence in the Characterization of Small and Diminutive Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Study in a Clinical Setting Using CAD EYE®

TypeobservationalSponsorUnidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra, EPERan2021 to 2021Enrolled197ConditionsColonic PolypsArmsCAD EYE® (Fujifilm, Europe, Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung, Dusseldorf, Germany)
NCT06173258 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence for Adenoma Detection in Water Exchange Colonoscopy: the WEAID Randomized Controlled Trial (Water Exchange With Artificial Intelligence-assisted Detection)

TypeinterventionalSponsorEvergreen General Hospital, TaiwanRan2023 to 2025Enrolled560ConditionsColon Adenoma, Colonoscopy, Colon PolypArmsWater exchange alone, Water exchange plus Artificial Intelligence (AI)
NCT06792292 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Real-World Experience of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening in a General Hospital: A Single-Center Cohort Phase IV Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorChirecRan2025 to 2027Enrolled765ConditionsArtificial Intelligence, Colonic Adenoma, Colonic Neoplasms, Colonic PolypArmsconventional colonoscopy procedure, artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy procedure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Patients' experiences and attitudes toward the use of real-time artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Quality indicators in colonoscopies performed in digestive endoscopy services in northeast Brazil.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026
    Article
  20. [What is confirmed in colorectal cancer screening?]Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Michal F KaminskiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Siwan Thomas-GibsonWolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St. Mark's Hospital, Harrow, and Imperial College, London, UK.
Marek BugajskiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Michael BretthauerDepartment of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Colin J ReesSouth Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust, South Tyneside, UK.
Evelien DekkerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Geir HoffDepartment of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Rodrigo JoverUnidad de Gastroenterologia, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Stepan SuchanekDepartment of Internal Medicine, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Monika FerlitschDepartment of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
John AndersonGloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, UK.
Thomas RoeschDepartment of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Rolf HultcranzKarolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Istvan RaczDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Petz Aladar County and Teaching Hospital, Györ, Hungary.
Ernst J KuipersDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Kjetil GarborgDepartment of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
James E EastTranslational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Maciej RupinskiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Birgitte SeipDepartment of Gastroenterology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.
Cathy BennettCentre for Technology Enabled Research, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Carlo SenoreCPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Silvia MinozziCPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Raf BisschopsDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Dirk DomagkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Joseph's Hospital, Warendorf, Germany.
Roland ValoriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucestershire, UK.
Cristiano SpadaDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Cesare HassanNuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Mario Dinis-RibeiroCenter for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Matthew D RutterDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and United European Gastroenterology present a short list of key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. We recommend that endoscopy services across Europe adopt the following seven key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy for measurement and evaluation in daily practice at a center and endoscopist level:

Indexed as

Colonoscopypatient safetyperformance measuresqualityquality indicators

Identifiers

PMID28507745
PMCPMC5415221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.