Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28507561›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2017

Deletion Extents Are Not the Cause of Clinical Variability in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: Does the Interaction between DGCR8 and miRNA-CNVs Play a Major Role?

Veronica Bertini, Alessia Azzarà, Annalisa Legitimo, Roberta Milone, Roberta Battini, Rita Consolini, Angelo Valetto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Veronica BertiniCytogenetics and Molecular Genetics Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Univeristaria PisanaPisa, Italy.
Alessia AzzaràCytogenetics and Molecular Genetics Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Univeristaria PisanaPisa, Italy.
Annalisa LegitimoLaboratory of Immunology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of PisaPisa, Italy.
Roberta MiloneDepartment of Developmental Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Stella MarisPisa, Italy.
Roberta BattiniDepartment of Developmental Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Stella MarisPisa, Italy.
Rita ConsoliniLaboratory of Immunology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of PisaPisa, Italy.
Angelo ValettoCytogenetics and Molecular Genetics Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Univeristaria PisanaPisa, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITFondazione Stella Maris · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In humans, the most common genomic disorder is the hemizygous deletion of the chromosome 22q11.2 region, that results in the "22q11.2 deletion syndrome" (22q11.2DS). A peculiarity of 22q11.2DS is its great phenotypic variability that makes this pathology a classic example of a syndrome with variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance. The reasons for this variability have not been elucidated yet, and the molecular substrates underlying the different clinical features of 22q11.2DS are still debated. A cohort of 21 patients has been analyzed by array CGH in order to detect some of the genetic differences that may influence this variability. Two aspects have been investigated: (1) the precise localization of the deletion breakpoints within the low copy repeats (LCRs), (2) the additional Copy Number Variations (CNVs) elsewhere in the genome, by analyzing their gene content. Both protein-coding genes and miRNAs were considered, in order to discover possible epistatic interactions between genes of the 22q11.2 region and the rest of the genome. Eighteen out of twenty-one patients had a deletion of ~3 Mb mediated by LCR22-A and D, whereas 3/21 had a smaller deletion. The breakpoints within the LCR22-A and D do not have a major role in the phenotypic variability since they are rather clustered and the small differences concern genes that are not directly related to clinical signs of 22q11.2DS. A detailed analysis of the gene content of 22q11.2 deleted region indicates that this syndrome could be a bioenergetic disorder or consequence of an altered post-transcriptional gene regulation, due to the presence of

Indexed as

22q11 deletion syndromearray CGHCNV-miRNAcopy number variationsDGCR8miRNA

Identifiers

PMID28507561
PMCPMC5410573
OpenAlexW2611750284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.