ArticleVeterinary world2017
Exploring the potential hazard of
Article in Veterinary world, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paratuberculosis in small ruminants in the Sudan: prevalence and risk factors.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Paratuberculosis in sheep and goats: Pathogenesis, diagnostic findings, and control strategies.Open veterinary journal · 2025Review
- Article
- First Report on Ovine Paratuberculosis in the Sudan: Diagnosis Using Different Techniques.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Paratuberculosis: The Hidden Killer of Small Ruminants.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Review
- Article
- Serum lipidomics of bovine paratuberculosis: Disruption of choline-containing glycerophospholipids and sphingolipids.SAGE open medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
aimThe present study was aimed to detect MAP in milk by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting IS MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 77 milk samples were collected randomly from lactating animals which include cows (45) and does (32). All the 77 milk samples were processed to identify the presence of MAP by employing the direct IS
resultsOut of 77 milk samples from asymptomatic lactating animals, 12 (15.58%) were showed positivity for IS
conclusionIn our study, 15.58% of milk samples showed IS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.