Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28507228›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2017

Understanding principles of integration and segregation using whole-brain computational connectomics: implications for neuropsychiatric disorders.

Louis-David Lord, Angus B Stevner, Gustavo Deco, Morten L Kringelbach

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. N,N-dimethyltryptamine effects on connectome harmonics, subjective experience and comparative psychedelic experiences.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Physical mechanisms of human brain functions.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Louis-David LordDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Angus B StevnerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Gustavo DecoCenter for Brain and Cognition, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain gustavo.deco@upf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8995-7583
Morten L KringelbachDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

European Research Council 295129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To survive in an ever-changing environment, the brain must seamlessly integrate a rich stream of incoming information into coherent internal representations that can then be used to efficiently plan for action. The brain must, however, balance its ability to

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalBrainComputer SimulationConnectomeDiffusion Tensor ImagingHumansMental DisordersNerve Netbrain connectivitycomputational modellingintegration and segregationnetwork analysisneuropsychiatric disorders

Identifiers

PMID28507228
PMCPMC5434074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.