Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28507011›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2017

Influence of Diet in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review.

M José Bagur, M Antonia Murcia, Antonia M Jiménez-Monreal, Josep A Tur, M Mar Bibiloni, Gonzalo L Alonso, Magdalena Martínez-Tomé

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 197 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Dietary interventions for multiple sclerosis-related outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M José BagurDepartment Science and Technology and Genetics Agroforestal, University of Castilla La-Mancha, Campus Universitario, Albacete, Spain.
M Antonia MurciaDepartment of Food Science, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum," University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Antonia M Jiménez-MonrealDepartment of Food Science, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum," University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Josep A TurCIBEROBN CB12/03/30038 (Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; and.
M Mar BibiloniCIBEROBN CB12/03/30038 (Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; and.
Gonzalo L AlonsoDepartment Science and Technology and Genetics Agroforestal, University of Castilla La-Mancha, Campus Universitario, Albacete, Spain.
Magdalena Martínez-ToméDepartment of Food Science, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum," University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain; mmtome@um.es.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrition is considered to be a possible factor in the pathogenesis of the neurological disease multiple sclerosis (MS). Nutrition intervention studies suggest that diet may be considered as a complementary treatment to control the progression of the disease; a systematic review of the literature on the influence of diet on MS was therefore conducted. The literature search was conducted by using Medlars Online International Literature (MEDLINE) via PubMed and Scopus. Forty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria. The reviewed articles assessed the relations between macro- and micronutrient intakes and MS incidence. The patients involved used alternative therapies (homeopathy), protocolized diets that included particular foods (herbal products such as grape seed extract, ginseng, blueberries, green tea, etc.), or dietary supplements such as vitamin D, carnitine, melatonin, or coenzyme Q10. Current studies suggest that high serum concentrations of vitamin D, a potent immunomodulator, may decrease the risk of MS and the risk of relapse and new lesions, while improving brain lesions and timed tandem walking. Experimental evidence suggests that serum vitamin D concentration is lower during MS relapses than in remission and is associated with a greater degree of disability [Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score >3]. The findings suggest that circulating vitamin D concentrations can be considered a biomarker of MS and supplemental vitamin D can be used therapeutically. Other studies point to a negative correlation between serum vitamin B-12 concentrations and EDSS score. Vitamin B-12 has fundamental roles in central nervous system function, especially in the methionine synthase-mediated conversion of homocysteine to methionine, which is essential for DNA and RNA synthesis. Therefore, vitamin B-12 deficiency may lead to an increase in the concentration of homocysteine. Further research is clearly necessary to determine whether treatment with vitamin B-12 supplements delays MS progression.

Indexed as

DietDietary SupplementsMultiple SclerosisDisease ProgressionHumansNutritional StatusVitamin B 12Vitamin B 12 DeficiencyVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyVitaminsVitamin B 12Vitamin DVitaminsdietfoodintakemultiple sclerosisnutritionsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28507011
PMCPMC5421121
OpenAlexW2615215796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.