Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28506945›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2017

Urinary fistula-A continuing problem with changing trends.

Sunesh Kumar, Richa Vatsa, Juhi Bharti, Kallol Kumar Roy, Jai Bhagwan Sharma, Neeta Singh, Jyoti Meena, Seema Singhal

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Vaginal repair of nonradiogenic urogenital fistulas.International urogynecology journal · 2021
    Article
  6. Rising trends in iatrogenic urogenital fistula: A new challenge.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sunesh KumarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Richa VatsaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Juhi BhartiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Kallol Kumar RoyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Jai Bhagwan SharmaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Neeta SinghDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Jyoti MeenaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Seema SinghalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUrinary fistula is a distressing complication after difficult vaginal deliveries, obstetric, and gynecologic surgeries. The present study describes a single center's experience in the management of urinary fistula at a tertiary care hospital. It was performed to analyze the etiology of genitourinary fistula, to assess the outcome after surgical repair, and to determine the changing trends in the etiology and management of urinary fistula. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis retrospective study was conducted over 5 years in the department of obstetrics and gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. Twenty patients who underwent surgical repair of urinary fistula were included in the study and analyzed for their etiology, presentation, site, size, previous failed repair, approach of surgical repair, and outcome. The findings of the present study were compared with a previous study at our center to determine the changing trends of urinary fistula.

resultsThe mean age of the study population was 37.05±8.08 years. The majority (65%) of the fistulae occurred following gynecologic surgeries, whereas 25% were due to obstructed labor, and 10% after cesarean section for other indications. The vaginal approach was used in all except one case of uterovesical fistula, which was repaired abdominally. The outcome was successful in 85% of cases. The success rate was similar in primary versus previous failed repair (p=0.270).

conclusionThe most common cause of urinary fistula in the present study was gynecologic surgery. The vaginal approach can be used even in cases with previous failed repairs with a high success rate.

Indexed as

obstructed labor iatrogenic.Urinary fistulavesicovaginal

Identifiers

PMID28506945
PMCPMC5450205
OpenAlexW2581656202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.