Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28506904›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2017

Ordinal convolutional neural networks for predicting RDoC positive valence psychiatric symptom severity scores.

Anthony Rios, Ramakanth Kavuluru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Deep neural networks in psychiatry.Molecular psychiatry · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Extracting Drug-Drug Interactions with Word and Character-Level Recurrent Neural Networks.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anthony RiosDepartment of Computer Science, University of Kentucky, 329 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40506, USA. Electronic address: anthony.rios1@uky.edu.
Ramakanth KavuluruDepartment of Computer Science, University of Kentucky, 329 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40506, USA; Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Internal Medicine, University Kentucky, 725 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536, USA. Electronic address: ramakanth.kavuluru@uky.edu.

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001998 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E, KERN, PHILIP A · 2016 to 2025
$34.2M
Research ProjectP50MH106933 · NIMH · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI KOHANE, ISAAC S. · 2014 to 2018
$17.0M
From Syntactic Relations to Semantic Predications: Porting Open Information Extraction to BiomedicineR21LM012274 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KAVULURU, VENKATA NAGA RAMAKANTH · 2016 to 2017
$374k
Challenges in Natural Language Processing in Clinical TextR13LM011411 · NLM · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI UZUNER, OZLEM · 2012 to 2016
$98k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001998NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH106933NLM NIH HHS R13 LM011411NLM NIH HHS R21 LM012274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe CEGS N-GRID 2016 Shared Task in Clinical Natural Language Processing (NLP) provided a set of 1000 neuropsychiatric notes to participants as part of a competition to predict psychiatric symptom severity scores. This paper summarizes our methods, results, and experiences based on our participation in the second track of the shared task.

objectiveClassical methods of text classification usually fall into one of three problem types: binary, multi-class, and multi-label classification. In this effort, we study ordinal regression problems with text data where misclassifications are penalized differently based on how far apart the ground truth and model predictions are on the ordinal scale. Specifically, we present our entries (methods and results) in the N-GRID shared task in predicting research domain criteria (RDoC) positive valence ordinal symptom severity scores (absent, mild, moderate, and severe) from psychiatric notes.

methodsWe propose a novel convolutional neural network (CNN) model designed to handle ordinal regression tasks on psychiatric notes. Broadly speaking, our model combines an ordinal loss function, a CNN, and conventional feature engineering (wide features) into a single model which is learned end-to-end. Given interpretability is an important concern with nonlinear models, we apply a recent approach called locally interpretable model-agnostic explanation (LIME) to identify important words that lead to instance specific predictions.

resultsOur best model entered into the shared task placed third among 24 teams and scored a macro mean absolute error (MMAE) based normalized score (100·(1-MMAE)) of 83.86. Since the competition, we improved our score (using basic ensembling) to 85.55, comparable with the winning shared task entry. Applying LIME to model predictions, we demonstrate the feasibility of instance specific prediction interpretation by identifying words that led to a particular decision.

conclusionIn this paper, we present a method that successfully uses wide features and an ordinal loss function applied to convolutional neural networks for ordinal text classification specifically in predicting psychiatric symptom severity scores. Our approach leads to excellent performance on the N-GRID shared task and is also amenable to interpretability using existing model-agnostic approaches.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerSeverity of Illness IndexHumansNeuropsychological TestsConvolutional neural networksModel interpretabilityOrdinal regressionResearch domain criteriaText classification

Identifiers

PMID28506904
PMCPMC5682241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.