Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28506872›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2017

Unreliability of putative fMRI biomarkers during emotional face processing.

C L Nord, A Gray, C J Charpentier, O J Robinson, J P Roiser

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Neuroimaging correlates and predictors of response to repeated-dose intravenous ketamine in PTSD: preliminary evidence.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Trial
  5. Neural predictors of treatment response to brain stimulation and psychological therapy in depression: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Anxiety Shapes Amygdala-Prefrontal Dynamics During Movie Watching.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. The Role of fMRI in Drug Development: An Update.Advances in neurobiology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C L NordInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.
A GrayInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.
C J CharpentierInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK; Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
O J RobinsonInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.
J P RoiserInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: j.roiser@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K024280/1Wellcome Trust 101798/Z/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is considerable need to develop tailored approaches to psychiatric treatment. Numerous researchers have proposed using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) biomarkers to predict therapeutic response, in particular by measuring task-evoked subgenual anterior cingulate (sgACC) and amygdala activation in mood and anxiety disorders. Translating this to the clinic relies on the assumption that blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) responses in these regions are stable within individuals. To test this assumption, we scanned a group of 29 volunteers twice (mean test-retest interval=14.3 days) and calculated the within-subject reliability of the amplitude of the amygdalae and sgACC BOLD responses to emotional faces using three paradigms: emotion identification; emotion matching; and gender classification. We also calculated the reliability of activation in a control region, the right fusiform face area (FFA). All three tasks elicited robust group activations in the amygdalae and sgACC (which changed little on average over scanning sessions), but within-subject reliability was surprisingly low, despite excellent reliability in the control right FFA region. Our findings demonstrate low statistical reliability of two important putative treatment biomarkers in mood and anxiety disorders.

Indexed as

AdultBrainBrain MappingEmotionsFacial RecognitionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMental DisordersReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultAmygdalaBiomarkerEmotionfMRIPsychiatrySubgenual cingulate

Identifiers

PMID28506872
PMCPMC5553850
OpenAlexW2613150566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.