Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28506563›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2017

Challenges to delivery and effectiveness of adjuvant radiation therapy in elderly patients with node-positive vulvar cancer.

Cameron W Swanick, Patricia J Eifel, Jinhai Huo, Larissa A Meyer, Grace L Smith

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Modern treatment of vulvar cancer.Radiology and oncology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cameron W SwanickDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Patricia J EifelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Jinhai HuoDepartment of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Larissa A MeyerDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Grace L SmithDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States. Electronic address: glsmith@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Marcos Estecio · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Economic Strain and Resilience in Cancer Patients: Assessing Patient-Reported Measures of the Burdens of TreatmentK07CA211804 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SMITH, GRACE · 2016 to 2020
$853k
Health Services Career Development: Improving Medical Decisions in Ovarian CancerK07CA201013 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MEYER, LARISSA ALEJANDRA · 2016 to 2020
$853k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA201013NCI NIH HHS K07 CA211804NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) use, patterns of RT delivery, and clinical outcomes in older patients with node-positive vulvar cancer.

methodsUsing SEER-Medicare linked data, we identified 444 patients (age≥66years) with node-positive squamous cell vulvar carcinoma, without distant metastases, and treated with primary surgery between 1991 and 2009. We used claims to examine RT use and the following delivery metrics: 1) completion of ≥20 fractions, 2) treatment duration <8weeks, 3) <1week of intra-treatment break, and 4) treatment interval from surgery to start of RT <8weeks. We tested associations between RT use and metrics with overall (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) using multivariate proportional hazards regression.

resultsMedian age was 78years (interquartile range [IQR]=74-83). Median follow-up was 17months (IQR=9-40). Three hundred six patients (69%) received RT. Three delivery metrics were associated with improved outcomes: completion of ≥20 fractions, treatment duration <8weeks, and <1week of intra-treatment break. Patients who achieved these 3 metrics demonstrated better disease outcomes compared with surgery alone (OS hazard ratio [HR] for death=0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.46-0.82, P=0.001; CSS HR=0.58, 95% CI=0.40-0.85,P=0.005). Patients not achieving RT metrics demonstrated marginal improvements in disease outcomes over surgery alone (OS HR=0.73, 95% CI=0.55-0.99,P=0.04; CSS HR=0.76, 95% CI=0.52-1.11, P=0.16). Notably, only 51% of patients who received RT achieved all benchmarks.

conclusionsIn this cohort of older women with node-positive vulvar cancer, achieving metrics for RT delivery was an important factor for optimizing disease benefits from treatment.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMedicareRadiotherapy, AdjuvantSEER ProgramUnited StatesVulvar NeoplasmsElderlyRadiationRadiation qualityVulvar cancer

Identifiers

PMID28506563
PMCPMC5896777
OpenAlexW2612018907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.