Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28506525›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2017

How Does Mg

Antarip Halder, Rohit Roy, Dhananjay Bhattacharyya, Abhijit Mitra

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antarip HalderCenter for Computational Natural Sciences and Bioinformatics (CCNSB), International Institute of Information Technology (IIIT-H), Gachibowli, Hyderabad, India.
Rohit RoyCenter for Computational Natural Sciences and Bioinformatics (CCNSB), International Institute of Information Technology (IIIT-H), Gachibowli, Hyderabad, India.
Dhananjay BhattacharyyaComputational Science Division, Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics (SINP), Kolkata, India.
Abhijit MitraCenter for Computational Natural Sciences and Bioinformatics (CCNSB), International Institute of Information Technology (IIIT-H), Gachibowli, Hyderabad, India. Electronic address: abi_chem@iiit.ac.in.
Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad · INSaha Institute of Nuclear Physics · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reverse Watson-Crick G:C basepairs (G:C W:W Trans) occur frequently in different functional RNAs. This is one of the few basepairs whose gas-phase-optimized isolated geometry is inconsistent with the corresponding experimental geometry. Several earlier studies indicate that through post-transcriptional modification, direct protonation, or coordination with Mg

Indexed as

BacteriaBase PairingCations, DivalentCytosineGuanineHydrogen BondingMagnesiumModels, GeneticModels, MolecularRNARNA FoldingRNA StabilityWaterCations, DivalentCytosineGuanineMagnesiumRNAWater

Identifiers

PMID28506525
PMCPMC5529177
OpenAlexW2613868261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.