Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28506274›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

Contextual and psychosocial factors predicting Ebola prevention behaviours using the RANAS approach to behaviour change in Guinea-Bissau.

Anna E Gamma, Jurgita Slekiene, Gregor von Medeazza, Fredrik Asplund, Placido Cardoso, Hans-Joachim Mosler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna E GammaEAWAG, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science & Technology, Environmental and Health Psychology, Überlandstrasse 133, CH-8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland. anna.gamma@eawag.ch.
Jurgita SlekieneEAWAG, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science & Technology, Environmental and Health Psychology, Überlandstrasse 133, CH-8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Gregor von MedeazzaUNICEF Guinea-Bissau, Apartado 464, 1034 Bissau Codex, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
Fredrik AsplundUNICEF Guinea-Bissau, Apartado 464, 1034 Bissau Codex, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
Placido CardosoINASA, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Pública, Avenida Combatente da Liberdade de Pátria, Hospital 3 de Agosto, Apartado 861, 1004 Bissau Codex, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
Hans-Joachim MoslerEAWAG, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science & Technology, Environmental and Health Psychology, Überlandstrasse 133, CH-8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe outbreak of the Ebola virus disease (EVD) in West Africa in December 2013 was the largest Ebola outbreak in history. This study aimed to measure the underlying contextual and psychosocial factors of intentions to perform Ebola prevention behaviours (not touching people who might be suffering from Ebola, reporting suspected cases to the National Ebola Hotline, NEH) in Guinea-Bissau. Geographical location, cross-border market activities, poor water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) conditions, and burial practices in some communities pose a serious risk in terms of potential EVD outbreak and seriously hamper its prevention in Guinea-Bissau.

methodsIn July and August 2015, quantitative data from 1369 respondents were gathered by structured face-to-face interviews. The questionnaire was based on the psychosocial factors of the RANAS (risks, attitudes, norms, abilities, and self-regulation) model. Data were analyzed by multiple linear regression analyses.

resultsThe most important predictors for the intention to call the NEH were believing that calling the Hotline would help the infected person, perceiving that important members from the household approve of calling the Hotline, thinking that calling the Hotline is something they should do, and believing that it is important to call the Hotline to report a suspected case. For the intention not to touch someone who might be suffering from Ebola, the most important predictors were health knowledge, the perception of risk with regard to touching a person who might be suffering from Ebola, and the belief that they were able not to touch a possibly infected person. Age in years was the only significant contextual predictor for one of the two behavioural intentions, the intention to call the Hotline. It seems that younger people are more likely to use a service like the NEH than older people.

conclusionsStrengths and gaps were identified in the study population in relation to the intention to perform prevention behaviours. These call for innovative ways of aligning existing hygiene programs with relevant psychosocial factors. This research is relevant to further outbreaks of contagious diseases as it sheds light on important aspects of the impact of public health interventions during emergencies and epidemics.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeIntentionRisk-TakingAdolescentAdultAfrica, WesternAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGuinea-BissauHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalBehavioural intentionBehavioural willingnessEbola preventionEmergencies and outbreaksEVDPsychosocial factorsRANAS modelRegression analysis

Identifiers

PMID28506274
PMCPMC5432987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.