Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28506251›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2017

Diversity, in-vitro virulence traits and antifungal susceptibility pattern of gastrointestinal yeast flora of healthy poultry, Gallus gallus domesticus.

Supram Hosuru Subramanya, Nawal Kishor Sharan, Bharat Prasad Baral, Deependra Hamal, Niranjan Nayak, Peralam Yegneswaran Prakash, Brijesh Sathian, Indira Bairy, Shishir Gokhale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Water Quality, Heavy Metals, and Antifungal Susceptibility to Fluconazole of Yeasts from Water Systems.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The emerging threat antifungal-resistantFrontiers in fungal biology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Temporal dynamics of the chicken mycobiome.Frontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Uncommon Non-Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Antifungal Susceptibility Profiles and Resistance Mechanisms of ClinicalFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Supram Hosuru SubramanyaManipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal. supram.gowda@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3488-4217
Nawal Kishor SharanManipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.
Bharat Prasad BaralManipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.
Deependra HamalManipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.
Niranjan NayakManipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.
Peralam Yegneswaran PrakashKasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Udupi, India.
Brijesh SathianManipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.
Indira BairyMelaka-Manipal Medical College, Manipal University, Udupi, India.
Shishir GokhaleManipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoultry farming and consumption of poultry (Gallus gallus domesticus) meat and eggs are common gastronomical practices worldwide. Till now, a detailed understanding about the gut colonisation of Gallus gallus domesticus by yeasts and their virulence properties and drug resistance patterns in available literature remain sparse. This study was undertaken to explore this prevalent issue.

resultsA total of 103 specimens of fresh droppings of broiler chickens (commercial G domesticus) and domesticated chickens (domesticated G domesticus) were collected from the breeding sites. The isolates comprised of 29 (33%) Debaryozyma hansenii (Candida famata), 12 (13.6%) Sporothrix catenata (C. ciferrii), 10 (11.4%) C. albicans, 8 (9.1%) Diutnia catenulata (C. catenulate), 6 (6.8%) C. tropicalis, 3 (3.4%) Candida acidothermophilum (C. krusei), 2 (2.3%) C. pintolopesii, 1 (1.1%) C. parapsilosis, 9 (10.2%) Trichosporon spp. (T. moniliiforme, T. asahii), 4 (4.5%) Geotrichum candidum, 3 (3.4%) Cryptococcus macerans and 1 (1%) Cystobasidium minuta (Rhodotorula minuta). Virulence factors, measured among different yeast species, showed wide variability. Biofilm cells exhibited higher Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) values (μg/ml) than planktonic cells against all antifungal compounds tested: (fluconazole, 8-512 vs 0.031-16; amphotericin B, 0.5-64 vs 0.031-16; voriconazole 0.062-16 vs 0.062-8; caspofungin, 0.062-4 vs 0.031-1).

conclusionsThe present work extends the current understanding of in vitro virulence factors and antifungal susceptibility pattern of gastrointestinal yeast flora of G domesticus. More studies with advanced techniques are needed to quantify the risk of spread of these potential pathogens to environment and human.

Indexed as

BiodiversityVirulenceVirulence FactorsAmphotericin BAnimalsAntifungal AgentsBiofilmsCaspofunginChickensColony Count, MicrobialDrug Resistance, FungalEchinocandinsFluconazoleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLipopeptidesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginEchinocandinsFluconazoleLipopeptidesVirulence FactorsVoriconazoleAntifungal resistanceGastrointestinal colonisationPoultry guanoVirulence factorYeast

Identifiers

PMID28506251
PMCPMC5433169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.