Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28506230›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

Health literacy and primary health care use of ethnic minorities in the Netherlands.

Marieke van der Gaag, Iris van der Heide, Peter M M Spreeuwenberg, Anne E M Brabers, Jany J D J M Rademakers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Health Literacy and Diabetes Knowledge: A Nationwide Survey in a Multi-Ethnic Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marieke van der GaagNIVEL - Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5459-2118
Iris van der HeideNIVEL - Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Peter M M SpreeuwenbergNIVEL - Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Anne E M BrabersNIVEL - Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Jany J D J M RademakersNIVEL - Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, Netherlands. j.rademakers@nivel.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the Netherlands, ethnic minority populations visit their general practitioner (GP) more often than the indigenous population. An explanation for this association is lacking. Recently, health literacy is suggested as a possible explaining mechanism. Internationally, associations between health literacy and health care use, and between ethnicity and health literacy have been studied separately, but, so far, have not been linked to each other. In the Netherlands, some expectations have been expressed with regard to supposed low health literacy of ethnic minority groups, however, no empirical study has been done so far. The objectives of this study are therefore to acquire insight into the level of health literacy of ethnic minorities in the Netherlands and to examine whether the relationship between ethnicity and health care use can be (partly) explained by health literacy.

methodsA questionnaire was sent to a sample of 2.116 members of the Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel (response rate 46%, 89 respondents of non-western origin). Health literacy was measured with the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) which covers nine different domains. The health literacy levels of ethnic minority groups were compared to the indigenous population. A negative binomial regression model was used to estimate the association between ethnicity and GP visits. To examine whether health literacy is an explaining factor in this association, health literacy and interaction terms of health literacy and ethnicity were added into the model.

resultsDifferences in levels of health literacy were only found between the Turkish population and the indigenous Dutch population. This study also found an association between ethnicity and GP visits. Ethnic minorities visit their GP 33% more often than the indigenous population. Three domains of the HLQ (the ability to navigate the health care system, the ability to find information and to read and understand health information) partly explained the association between ethnicity and GP visits.

conclusionsIn general, there are no differences in health literacy between most of the ethnic minority groups in the Netherlands and the indigenous Dutch population. Only the Turkish population scored significantly lower on several health literacy domains. Some domains of health literacy do explain the association between ethnicity and higher frequency of GP visits. Further research is recommended to understand the pathways through which health literacy impacts health care use.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyAgedEthnicityFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinority GroupsMoroccoNetherlandsNetherlands AntillesPrimary Health CareSurinameSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyEthnic minoritiesGeneral practitionerHealth literacyPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID28506230
PMCPMC5432986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.