Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28506151›Full record

ArticleAssistive technology : the official journal of RESNA2018

A new primary mobility tool for the visually impaired: A white cane-adaptive mobility device hybrid.

John-Ross Rizzo, Kyle Conti, Teena Thomas, Todd E Hudson, Robert Wall Emerson, Dae Shik Kim

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John-Ross Rizzoa Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation , NYU School of Medicine , New York , New York , USA.
Kyle Contia Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation , NYU School of Medicine , New York , New York , USA.
Teena Thomasa Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation , NYU School of Medicine , New York , New York , USA.
Todd E Hudsona Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation , NYU School of Medicine , New York , New York , USA.
Robert Wall Emersond Department of Blindness and Low Vision Studies , Western Michigan University , Kalamazoo , Michigan , USA.
Dae Shik Kimd Department of Blindness and Low Vision Studies , Western Michigan University , Kalamazoo , Michigan , USA.
New York University · USWestern Michigan University · US

Funding

Rehabilitation Medicine Scientist Training (RMST) ProgramK12HD001097 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BONINGER, MICHAEL L. · 1995 to 2016
$14.1M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article describes pilot testing of an adaptive mobility device-hybrid (AMD-H) combining properties of two primary mobility tools for people who are blind: the long cane and adaptive mobility devices (AMDs). The long cane is the primary mobility tool used by people who are blind and visually impaired for independent and safe mobility and AMDs are adaptive devices that are often lightweight frames approximately body width in lateral dimension that are simply pushed forward to clear the space in front of a person. The prototype cane built for this study had a wing apparatus that could be folded around the shaft of a cane but when unfolded, deployed two wheeled wings 25 cm (9.8 in) to each side of the canetip. This project explored drop-off and obstacle detection for 6 adults with visual impairment using the deployed AMD-H and a standard long cane. The AMD-H improved obstacle detection overall, and was most effective for the smallest obstacles (2 and 6 inch diameter). The AMD-H cut the average drop off threshold from 1.79 inches (4.55 cm) to .96 inches (2.44 cm). All participants showed a decrease in drop off detection threshold and an increase in detection rate (13.9% overall). For drop offs of 1 in (2.54 cm) and 3 in (7.62 cm), all participants showed large improvements with the AMD-H, ranging from 8.4 to 50%. The larger drop offs of 5 in (12.7 cm) and 7 in (17.8 cm) were well detected by both types of canes.

Indexed as

CanesSelf-Help DevicesAdultEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMobility LimitationPersons with Visual DisabilitiesSignal Processing, Computer-Assistedadaptive caneblindcanemobility

Identifiers

PMID28506151
PMCPMC6019536
OpenAlexW2614551426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.