Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28505367›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2017

Effect of health information exchange on recognition of medication discrepancies is interrupted when data charges are introduced: results of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Kenneth S Boockvar, William Ho, Jennifer Pruskowski, Katherine E DiPalo, Jane J Wong, Jessica Patel, Jonathan R Nebeker, Rainu Kaushal, William Hung

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Reducing medication errors for adults in hospital settings.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. A systematic literature review of LASA error interventions.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. The benefits of health information exchange: an updated systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Findings from 2017 on Health Information ManagementYearbook of medical informatics · 2018
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Trends in user-initiated health information exchange in the inpatient, outpatient, and emergency settings.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Kenneth S BoockvarGeriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
William HoPharmacy Department, James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Jennifer PruskowskiDepartment of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Katherine E DiPaloDepartment of Pharmacy, Montefiore Einstein Center for Heart and Vascular Care, Bronx, NY, USA.
Jane J WongPharmacy Department, James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Jessica PatelPharmacy Department, St Joseph's Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA.
Jonathan R NebekerInformatics and Computing, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA and University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Rainu KaushalHealthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
William HungGeriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
James J. Peters VA Medical Center · USCornell University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMontefiore Medical Center · USSt. Joseph's Hospital · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Implementing A Regional Data Exchange Tool To Improve Medication Use And SafetyI01HX000506 · VA · JAMES J PETERS VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BOOCKVAR, KENNETH S. · 2012 to 2013
–
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the effect of health information exchange (HIE) on medication prescribing for hospital inpatients in a cluster-randomized controlled trial, and to examine the prescribing effect of availability of information from a large pharmacy insurance plan in a natural experiment.

methodsPatients admitted to an urban hospital received structured medication reconciliation by an intervention pharmacist with (intervention) or without (control) access to a regional HIE. The HIE contained prescribing information from the largest hospitals and pharmacy insurance plan in the region for the first 10 months of the study, but only from the hospitals for the last 21 months, when data charges were imposed by the insurance plan. The primary endpoint was discrepancies between preadmission and inpatient medication regimens, and secondary endpoints included adverse drug events (ADEs) and proportions of rectified discrepancies.

resultsOverall, 186 and 195 patients were assigned to intervention and control, respectively. Patients were 60 years old on average and took a mean of 7 medications before admission. There was no difference between intervention and control in number of risk-weighted discrepancies (6.4 vs 5.8, P = .452), discrepancy-associated ADEs (0.102 vs 0.092 per admission, P = .964), or rectification of discrepancies (0.026 vs 0.036 per opportunity, P = .539). However, patients who received medication reconciliation with pharmacy insurance data available had more risk-weighted medication discrepancies identified than those who received usual care (8.0 vs 5.9, P = .038). DISCUSSION AND

conclusionHIE may improve outcomes of medication reconciliation. Charging for access to medication information interrupts this effect. Efforts are needed to understand and increase prescribers' rectification of medication discrepancies.

Indexed as

Access to InformationMedication ReconciliationAdultAgedDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHealth Information ExchangeHospitals, UrbanHospitals, VeteransHumansInsurance, Pharmaceutical ServicesMaleMiddle AgedRegression AnalysisUnited Stateshealth information exchangemedication reconciliationrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID28505367
PMCPMC7651981
OpenAlexW2612116204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.