Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28505285›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society2017

Defining Pediatric Diarrhea in Low-Resource Settings.

Gillian A Levine, Judd L Walson, Hannah E Atlas, Laura M Lamberti, Patricia B Pavlinac

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Roots ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Detection of Two Copies of aInfection and drug resistance · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Aqueous Tuber Extracts ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gillian A LevineDepartments of Epidemiology.
Judd L WalsonDepartments of Epidemiology.
Hannah E AtlasGlobal Health.
Laura M LambertiDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Patricia B PavlinacGlobal Health.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differences in definitions of acute pediatric diarrhea result in variable estimates of morbidity and mortality, treatment coverage, and associations with risk factors and outcomes. We reviewed published literature and guidelines focused on acute pediatric diarrhea in low- and middle-income countries. Clinical guidelines most commonly defined diarrhea in terms of quantity of loose or watery stool with consideration of normal stool patterns, whereas research studies often relied exclusively on a quantitative definition. The most commonly used quantitative definition, ≥3 loose or watery stools in a 24-hour period, has been compared to gold standards of caregiver perception and visual inspection of stool, with variable agreement. Age, breast-feeding status, and setting (facility vs household-based) influence the performance of quantitative diarrhea definitions in children. Universal adoption of a set of valid gold standard definitions specifically aligned with various programmatic and research goals will lead to more accurate coverage estimates and better-informed resource prioritization.

Indexed as

ChildDeveloping CountriesDiarrheaHumansTerminology as Topicdefinitionsdiarrheaempiric basispediatrics

Identifiers

PMID28505285
PMCPMC5907861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.