Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28505280›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2018

Mining e-cigarette adverse events in social media using Bi-LSTM recurrent neural network with word embedding representation.

Jiaheng Xie, Xiao Liu, Daniel Dajun Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Can Race-sensitive Biomedical Embeddings Improve Healthcare Predictive Models?AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. HARNESSING SOCIAL MEDIA FOR HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT.Electronic commerce research and applications
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiaheng XieDepartment of Management Information Systems, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Xiao LiuDepartment of Operation and Information Systems, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Daniel Dajun ZengDepartment of Management Information Systems, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Funding

Understanding E-Cigarette Adoption and Marketing: A Social Media StudyR01DA037378 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI LEISCHOW, SCOTT J, ZHANG, BIN · 2014 to 2018
$2.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Recent years have seen increased worldwide popularity of e-cigarette use. However, the risks of e-cigarettes are underexamined. Most e-cigarette adverse event studies have achieved low detection rates due to limited subject sample sizes in the experiments and surveys. Social media provides a large data repository of consumers' e-cigarette feedback and experiences, which are useful for e-cigarette safety surveillance. However, it is difficult to automatically interpret the informal and nontechnical consumer vocabulary about e-cigarettes in social media. This issue hinders the use of social media content for e-cigarette safety surveillance. Recent developments in deep neural network methods have shown promise for named entity extraction from noisy text. Motivated by these observations, we aimed to design a deep neural network approach to extract e-cigarette safety information in social media. Methods: Our deep neural language model utilizes word embedding as the representation of text input and recognizes named entity types with the state-of-the-art Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (Bi-LSTM) Recurrent Neural Network. Results: Our Bi-LSTM model achieved the best performance compared to 3 baseline models, with a precision of 94.10%, a recall of 91.80%, and an F-measure of 92.94%. We identified 1591 unique adverse events and 9930 unique e-cigarette components (ie, chemicals, flavors, and devices) from our research testbed. Conclusion: Although the conditional random field baseline model had slightly better precision than our approach, our Bi-LSTM model achieved much higher recall, resulting in the best F-measure. Our method can be generalized to extract medical concepts from social media for other medical applications.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsNeural Networks, ComputerSocial MediaData MiningHumansSemanticsVapingBi-LSTMdeep neural networkE-cigarette adverse eventrecurrent neural networkword embedding

Identifiers

PMID28505280
PMCPMC6455898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.