Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28505201›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Assessment of antibody library diversity through next generation sequencing and technical error compensation.

Marco Fantini, Luca Pandolfini, Simonetta Lisi, Michele Chirichella, Ivan Arisi, Marco Terrigno, Martina Goracci, Federico Cremisi, Antonino Cattaneo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marco FantiniBio@SNS Laboratory, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy.
Luca PandolfiniBio@SNS Laboratory, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1444-8167
Simonetta LisiBio@SNS Laboratory, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy.
Michele ChirichellaBio@SNS Laboratory, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy.
Ivan ArisiEuropean Brain Research Institute, Roma, Italy.
Marco TerrignoBio@SNS Laboratory, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8967-7269
Martina GoracciBio@SNS Laboratory, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy.
Federico CremisiBio@SNS Laboratory, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy.
Antonino CattaneoBio@SNS Laboratory, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibody libraries are important resources to derive antibodies to be used for a wide range of applications, from structural and functional studies to intracellular protein interference studies to developing new diagnostics and therapeutics. Whatever the goal, the key parameter for an antibody library is its complexity (also known as diversity), i.e. the number of distinct elements in the collection, which directly reflects the probability of finding in the library an antibody against a given antigen, of sufficiently high affinity. Quantitative evaluation of antibody library complexity and quality has been for a long time inadequately addressed, due to the high similarity and length of the sequences of the library. Complexity was usually inferred by the transformation efficiency and tested either by fingerprinting and/or sequencing of a few hundred random library elements. Inferring complexity from such a small sampling is, however, very rudimental and gives limited information about the real diversity, because complexity does not scale linearly with sample size. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has opened new ways to tackle the antibody library complexity quality assessment. However, much remains to be done to fully exploit the potential of NGS for the quantitative analysis of antibody repertoires and to overcome current limitations. To obtain a more reliable antibody library complexity estimate here we show a new, PCR-free, NGS approach to sequence antibody libraries on Illumina platform, coupled to a new bioinformatic analysis and software (Diversity Estimator of Antibody Library, DEAL) that allows to reliably estimate the complexity, taking in consideration the sequencing error.

Indexed as

Gene LibraryHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAntibodiesAntibody DiversityCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHumansSingle-Chain AntibodiesV(D)J RecombinationWorkflowAntibodiesSingle-Chain Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID28505201
PMCPMC5432181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.