Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28505195›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Dose escalation study to evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy of intravenous etoposide phosphate administration in 27 dogs with multicentric lymphoma.

Pierre Boyé, François Serres, Laurent Marescaux, Juliette Hordeaux, Emmanuel Bouchaert, Bruno Gomes, Dominique Tierny

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pierre BoyéOncovet-Clinical-Research (OCR), SIRIC ONCOLille, Parc Eurasanté, Loos, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2954-2842
François SerresOncovet-Clinical-Research (OCR), SIRIC ONCOLille, Parc Eurasanté, Loos, France.
Laurent MarescauxOncovet, SIRIC ONCOLille, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
Juliette HordeauxOncovet-Clinical-Research (OCR), SIRIC ONCOLille, Parc Eurasanté, Loos, France.
Emmanuel BouchaertOncovet-Clinical-Research (OCR), SIRIC ONCOLille, Parc Eurasanté, Loos, France.
Bruno GomesInstitut de Recherche Pierre Fabre, Toulouse, France.
Dominique TiernyOncovet-Clinical-Research (OCR), SIRIC ONCOLille, Parc Eurasanté, Loos, France.
Eurasanté · FROnco Lille · FRPierre Fabre (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative oncology has shown that naturally occurring canine cancers are of valuable and translatable interest for the understanding of human cancer biology and the characterization of new therapies. This work was part of a comparative oncology project assessing a new, clinical-stage topoisomerase II inhibitor and comparing it with etoposide in dogs with spontaneous lymphoma with the objective to translate findings from dogs to humans. Etoposide is a topoisomerase II inhibitor widely used in various humans' solid and hematopoietic cancer, but little data is available concerning its potential antitumor efficacy in dogs. Etoposide phosphate is a water-soluble prodrug of etoposide which is expected to be better tolerated in dogs. The objectives of this study were to assess the safety, the tolerability and the efficacy of intravenous etoposide phosphate in dogs with multicentric lymphoma. Seven dose levels were evaluated in a traditional 3+3 phase I design. Twenty-seven owned-dogs with high-grade multicentric lymphoma were enrolled and treated with three cycles of etoposide phosphate IV injections every 2 weeks. Adverse effects were graded according to the Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group criteria. A complete end-staging was realized 45 days after inclusion. The maximal tolerated dose was 300 mg/m2. At this dose level, the overall response rate was 83.3% (n = 6, 3 PR and 2 CR). Only a moderate reversible gastrointestinal toxicity, no severe myelotoxicity and no hypersensitivity reaction were reported at this dose level. Beyond the characterization of etoposide clinical efficacy in dogs, this study underlined the clinical and therapeutic homologies between dog and human lymphomas.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsDog DiseasesDogsEtoposideLymphomaNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingOrganophosphorus CompoundsTreatment OutcomeTumor BurdenAntineoplastic AgentsEtoposideetoposide phosphateOrganophosphorus Compounds

Identifiers

PMID28505195
PMCPMC5432161
OpenAlexW2616072648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.