Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28504303›Full record

SynthesisChild development2018

Distracted Walking, Bicycling, and Driving: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mobile Technology and Youth Crash Risk.

Despina Stavrinos, Caitlin N Pope, Jiabin Shen, David C Schwebel

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Child development, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Characterizing the Learning-to-Drive Period for Teens with Attention Deficits.Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Risk Factors for Road-Traffic Injuries Associated with E-Bike: Case-Control and Case-Crossover Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. State-of-the-art review: preventing child and youth pedestrian motor vehicle collisions: critical issues and future directions.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Nomophobia: Is the Fear of Being without a Smartphone Associated with Problematic Use?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Despina StavrinosUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Caitlin N PopeUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Jiabin ShenResearch Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital.
David C SchwebelUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.

Funding

Pilot CoreP30AG022838 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BALL, KARLENE K · 2003 to 2020
$5.7M
Virtual Reality by Mobile Phone: Improving Child Pedestrian SafetyR01HD088415 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SCHWEBEL, DAVID C · 2016 to 2021
$2.8M
Distracted Pedestrian Behavior: Intervention to Increase SafetyR21HD078371 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SCHWEBEL, DAVID C · 2015 to 2016
$391k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG022838NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD088415NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD078371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article examined the impact of mobile technology on young pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers. A systematic search yielded 41 articles meeting inclusion criteria: peer-reviewed, published before February 1, 2016, behavioral outcome related to pedestrian, bicycling, or driving in the presence of mobile technology use, youth sample. Eleven studies were meta-analyzed to evaluate increased risk for crash/near-crash while distracted. Risk of bias and quality of research were assessed. Across methodologies, developmental stages, and type of distracting task, mobile technology use impairs youth safety on the road. Quality of evidence was low (pedestrian) to moderate (driving). Findings are discussed from the perspective of cognitive and visual distractions. Policy and behavioral efforts should continue to reduce mobile technology use in transportation settings.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorAttentionAccidents, TrafficAdolescentAutomobile DrivingBicyclingCell PhoneHumansWalking

Identifiers

PMID28504303
PMCPMC5685949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.