Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28504112›Full record

ArticleSurgery2017

Potential impact of a volume pledge on spatial access: A population-level analysis of patients undergoing pancreatectomy.

Zhi Ven Fong, Andrew P Loehrer, Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo, Yanik J Bababekov, Ginger Jin, Cristina R Ferrone, Andrew L Warshaw, Lara N Traeger, Matthew M Hutter, Keith D Lillemoe and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rates of Minimally Invasive Surgery After Introduction of Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Common General Surgery Operations.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Geographic impact on access to care and survival for non-curative esophagogastric cancer: a population-based study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2021
    Article
  16. Travel Patterns among Patients Undergoing Hepatic Resection in California: Does Driving Further for Care Improve Outcomes?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  17. Trends in the Geospatial Distribution of Adult Inpatient Surgical Cancer Care Across the United States.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  18. Effect of centralization on complex surgical care: A population-based case study of radical cystectomy.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zhi Ven FongCodman Center for Clinical Effectiveness in Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Electronic address: zfong@partners.org.
Andrew P LoehrerDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Carlos Fernández-Del CastilloCodman Center for Clinical Effectiveness in Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Yanik J BababekovCodman Center for Clinical Effectiveness in Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Ginger JinCodman Center for Clinical Effectiveness in Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Cristina R FerroneCodman Center for Clinical Effectiveness in Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Andrew L WarshawCodman Center for Clinical Effectiveness in Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Lara N TraegerBehavioral Medicine Service, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Matthew M HutterCodman Center for Clinical Effectiveness in Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Keith D LillemoeCodman Center for Clinical Effectiveness in Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
David C ChangCodman Center for Clinical Effectiveness in Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Funding

Impact of Volume-Based Regionalization on Access to Care in Patients Undergoing PancreatectomyF32CA217455 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FONG, ZHI VEN · 2017 to 2018
$157k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA217455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA minimum-volume policy restricting hospitals not meeting the threshold from performing complex operation may increase travel burden and decrease spatial access to operation. We aim to identify vulnerable populations that would be sensitive to an added travel burden.

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of the database of the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development for patients undergoing pancreatectomy from 2005 to 2014. Number of hospitals bypassed was used as a metric for travel. Patients bypassing fewer hospitals were deemed to be more sensitive to an added travel burden.

resultsThere were 13,374 patients who underwent a pancreatectomy, of whom 2,368 (17.7%) were nonbypassers. On unadjusted analysis, patients >80 year old travelled less than their younger counterparts, bypassing a mean of 10.9 ± 9.5 hospitals compared with 14.2 ± 21.3 hospitals bypassed by the 35-49 year old age group (P < .001). Racial minorities travelled less when compared with non-Hispanic whites (P < .001). Patients identifying their payer status as self-pay (8.9 ± 15.6 hospitals bypassed) and Medicaid (10.1 ± 17.2 hospitals bypassed) also travelled less when compared with patients with private insurance (13.8 ± 20.4 hospitals bypassed, P < .001). On multivariate analysis, advanced age, racial minority, and patients with self-pay or Medicaid payer status were associated independently with increased sensitivity to an added travel burden.

conclusionIn patients undergoing pancreatectomy, the elderly, racial minorities, and patients with self-pay or Medicaid payer status were associated with an increased sensitivity to an added travel burden. This vulnerable cohort may be affected disproportionately by a minimum-volume policy.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityHospitals, High-VolumeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaliforniaFemaleHumansMaleMedicaidMiddle AgedMinority GroupsPancreatectomyPancreatic DiseasesRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID28504112
PMCPMC5889083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.