ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2017
'Pragmatic' and 'explanatory' attitudes to randomised trials.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Use of pragmatic randomized trials in multiple sclerosis: A systematic overview.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Trial
- Effect of Wearing Glasses on Risk of Infection With SARS-CoV-2 in the Community: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- A Comparison of Methods for Testing and Implementing Community Health Interventions in Childhood: A Realist Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- Article
- Randomised controlled trial of HOYA one-day multifocal contact lenses: The HOMCL trial.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Methodological challenges in pragmatic trials in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: Opportunities for improvement.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2022Article
- Research and Scholarly Methods: Pragmatic Clinical Trials.Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP · 2022Article
- [Benefit assessment of digital health applications-challenges and opportunities].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2021Review
- Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2021Article
- Article
- Embedding patient- and public health-oriented research in a national health service: the GISSI experience.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2019Article
- Article
- Clinical drug trials in general practice: how well are external validity issues reported?BMC family practice · 2017Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.