Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28503955›Full record

ReviewExpert review of gastroenterology & hepatology2017

New insights into the earliest stages of colorectal tumorigenesis.

Chelsie K Sievers, William M Grady, Richard B Halberg, Perry J Pickhardt

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Role of gut microbiota in epigenetic regulation of colorectal Cancer.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chelsie K Sieversa Department of Oncology, McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research , University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health , Madison , WI , USA.
William M Gradyc Clinical Research Division , Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center , Seattle , WA , USA.
Richard B Halberga Department of Oncology, McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research , University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health , Madison , WI , USA.
Perry J Pickhardtf Department of Radiology , University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health , Madison , WI , USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AMY TRENTHAM-DIETZ · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
Training in Cancer Biology Training GrantT32CA009135 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SUGDEN, WILLIAM M. · 1985 to 2024
$10.4M
Identify and validate novel epigenetic molecular markers for colorectal neoplasmU01CA152756 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI GRADY, WILLIAM MALLORY, GUDA, KISHORE · 2010 to 2021
$6.7M
(PQC1) Accelerated biological aging and colon polyp to cancer progressionR01CA194663 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI GRADY, WILLIAM MALLORY · 2015 to 2018
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA194663NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009135NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTumors in the large intestine have been postulated to arise via a stepwise accumulation of mutations, a process that takes up to 20 years. Recent advances in lineage tracing and DNA sequencing, however, are revealing new evolutionary models that better explain the vast amount of heterogeneity observed within and across colorectal tumors. Areas covered: A review of the literature supporting a novel model of colorectal tumor evolution was conducted. The following commentary examines the basic science and clinical evidence supporting a modified view of tumor initiation and progression in the colon. Expert commentary: The proposed 'cancer punctuated equilibrium' model of tumor evolution better explains the variability seen within and across polyps of the colon and rectum. Small colorectal polyps (6-9mm) followed longitudinally by interval imaging with CT colonography have been reported to have multiple fates: some growing, some remaining static in size, and others regressing in size over time. This new model allows for this variability in growth behavior and supports the hypothesis that some tumors can be 'born to be bad' as originally postulated by Sottoriva and colleagues, with very early molecular events impacting tumor fitness and growth behavior in the later stages of the disease process.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCell ProliferationCell Transformation, NeoplasticColonic PolypsColorectal NeoplasmsEvolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansModels, BiologicalPhenotypeTime FactorsTumor BurdenBiomarkers, TumorBig Bang modelcolorectal cancerCT colonographypunctuated equilibriumtumor heterogeneitytumorigenesis

Identifiers

PMID28503955
PMCPMC5859121
OpenAlexW2616516632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.