ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics2016
Learning Optimal Individualized Treatment Rules from Electronic Health Record Data.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning optimal dynamic treatment regimes from longitudinal data.American journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- A novel kernel based approach to arbitrary length symbolic data with application to type 2 diabetes risk.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A semiparametric instrumental variable approach to optimal treatment regimes under endogeneity.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2021Article
- Learning Personalized Treatment Rules from Electronic Health Records Using Topic Modeling Feature Extraction.Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics. IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics · 2019Article
- Precision Medicine.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2019Article
- Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Treatment Regimes on Medical Registry Data.Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medical research is experiencing a paradigm shift from "one-size-fits-all" strategy to a precision medicine approach where the right therapy, for the right patient, and at the right time, will be prescribed. We propose a statistical method to estimate the optimal individualized treatment rules (ITRs) that are tailored according to subject-specific features using electronic health records (EHR) data. Our approach merges statistical modeling and medical domain knowledge with machine learning algorithms to assist personalized medical decision making using EHR. We transform the estimation of optimal ITR into a classification problem and account for the non-experimental features of the EHR data and confounding by clinical indication. We create a broad range of feature variables that reflect both patient health status and healthcare data collection process. Using EHR data collected at Columbia University clinical data warehouse, we construct a decision tree for choosing the best second line therapy for treating type 2 diabetes patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.