Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28503405›Full record

ArticleJournal of Biomedicine (Sydney, NSW)2017

Nanoparticle Design Strategies for Effective Cancer Immunotherapy.

Praveena Velpurisiva, Aniket Gad, Brandon Piel, Rahul Jadia, Prakash Rai

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Biomedicine (Sydney, NSW), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Current Advances in Nanocarriers for Cancer Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Green Synthesis and Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles UsingInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Nanomedicine in Lung Cancer Immunotherapy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Immune cell engineering: opportunities in lung cancer therapeutics.Drug delivery and translational research · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Praveena VelpurisivaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Massachusetts Lowell, USA.
Aniket GadDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Massachusetts Lowell, USA.
Brandon PielDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, USA.
Rahul JadiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Massachusetts Lowell, USA.
Prakash RaiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, USA.
University of Massachusetts Lowell · US

Funding

Theranostic Nanomedicine for Breast Cancer Prevention and Image-Guided TherapyR00CA153948 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL · PI RAI, PRAKASH R · 2012 to 2014
$704k
Theranostic Nanomedicine for Breast Cancer Prevention and Image-Guided TherapyK99CA153948 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI RAI, PRAKASH R · 2010 to 2011
$245k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA153948NCI NIH HHS R00 CA153948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy is a rapidly evolving and paradigm shifting treatment modality that adds a strong tool to the collective cancer treatment arsenal. It can be effective even for late stage diagnoses and has already received clinical approval. Tumors are known to not only avoid immune surveillance but also exploit the immune system to continue local tumor growth and metastasis. Because of this, most immunotherapies, particularly those directed against solid cancers, have thus far only benefited a small minority of patients. Early clinical substantiation lends weight to the claim that cancer immunotherapies, which are adaptive and enduring treatment methods, generate much more sustained and robust anticancer effects when they are effectively formulated in nanoparticles or scaffolds than when they are administered as free drugs. Engineering cancer immunotherapies using nanomaterials is, therefore, a very promising area worthy of further consideration and investigation. This review focuses on the recent advances in cancer immunoengineering using nanoparticles for enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of a diverse range of immunotherapies. The delivery of immunostimulatory agents to antitumor immune cells, such as dendritic or antigen presenting cells, may be a far more efficient tactic to eradicate tumors than delivery of conventional chemotherapeutic and cytotoxic drugs to cancer cells. In addition to its immense therapeutic potential, immunoengineering using nanoparticles also provides a valuable tool for unearthing and understanding the basics of tumor biology. Recent research using nanoparticles for cancer immunotherapy has demonstrated the advantage of physicochemical manipulation in improving the delivery of immunostimulatory agents. In vivo studies have tested a range of particle sizes, mostly less than 300 nm, and particles with both positive and negative zeta potentials for various applications. Material composition and surface modifications have been shown to contribute significantly in selective targeting, efficient delivery and active stimulation of immune system targets. Thus, these investigations, including a wide array of nanoparticles for cancer immunotherapy, substantiate the employment of nanocarriers for efficacious cancer immunotherapies.

Indexed as

cancer vaccinedrug deliveryimmunologyimmunomodulationimmunostimulationimmunosuppressionimmunotheranosticsmonoclonal antibodynanomedicinevirus-based vaccine

Identifiers

PMID28503405
PMCPMC5426812
OpenAlexW2592942575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.