ArticleAllergo journal international2017
Diagnostics in Hymenoptera venom allergy: current concepts and developments with special focus on molecular allergy diagnostics.
Article in Allergo journal international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanobody-based IgG simultaneously inhibit the allergenic and enzymatic activity of the dominant honeybee venom allergen.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- In vitro diagnostics in hymenoptera venom allergy: Current concepts and perspectives.Allergologie select · 2026Review
- Comparison of basophil activation testing and component-resolved diagnosis in patients with cross-reactive intradermal results after anaphylactic reactions to hymenoptera venom.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Editorial: venom collection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Time-dependent cytokines changes in ultra-rush wasp venom immunotherapy.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Skin prick tests are not useful for the qualification for venom immunotherapy in children.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2023Article
- Molecular diagnostics and inhibition of cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants in Hymenoptera venom allergy.Clinical and translational allergy · 2023Article
- Potential and limitations of epitope mapping and molecular targeting in Hymenoptera venom allergy.Frontiers in allergy · 2023Review
- Review
- [Significance of molecular diagnostics in allergen immunotherapy : Practical tips for the application in various groups of allergens with exemplary cases].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2021Review
- Review
- Precision medicine reaching out to the patients in allergology - a German-Japanese workshop report.Allergologie select · 2021Article
- Safety and tolerability of venom immunotherapy: Evaluation of 581 rush- and ultra-rush induction protocols (safety of rush and ultra-rush venom immunotherapy).The World Allergy Organization journal · 2021Article
- Antigen 5 Allergens of Hymenoptera Venoms and Their Role in Diagnosis and Therapy of Venom Allergy.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2020Review
- The Honeybee Venom Major Allergen Api m 10 (Icarapin) and Its Role in Diagnostics and Treatment of Hymenoptera Venom Allergy.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2020Review
- Functional Profile of Antigen Specific CD4Toxins · 2020Article
- A WAO - ARIA - GAThe World Allergy Organization journal · 2020Article
- Precision Medicine in Hymenoptera Venom Allergy: Diagnostics, Biomarkers, and Therapy of Different Endotypes and Phenotypes.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe high rate of asymptomatic sensitization to Hymenoptera venom, difficulty in correctly identifying Hymenoptera and loss of sensitization over time make an accurate diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy challenging. Although routine diagnostic tests encompassing skin tests and the detection of venom-specific IgE antibodies with whole venom preparations are reliable, they offer insufficient precision in the case of double sensitized patients or in those with a history of sting anaphylaxis, in whom sensitization cannot be proven or only to the presumably wrong venom.
methodsSystematic literature research and review of current concepts of diagnostic testing in Hymenoptera venom allergy. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Improvements in diagnostic accuracy over recent years have mainly been due to the increasing use of molecular allergy diagnostics. Detection of specific IgE antibodies to marker and cross-reactive venom allergens improves the discrimination between genuine sensitization and cross-reactivity, and this provides a better rationale for prescribing venom immunotherapy. The basophil activation test has also increased diagnostic accuracy by reducing the number of Hymenoptera venom sensitizations overlooked with routine tests. This paper reviews current concepts of diagnostic testing in Hymenoptera venom allergy and suggests fields for further development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.