Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28503226›Full record

ArticlePharmacy practice

Consumer views on safety of over-the-counter drugs, preferred retailers and information sources in Sweden: after re-regulation of the pharmacy market.

Tommy Westerlund, Sahra Barzi, Cecilia Bernsten

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tommy WesterlundMSc (Pharm), MSc, PhD. Associate Professor. Department of Use of Medical Products, Medical Products Agency, Uppsala; Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Medicine, Epidemiology and Social Medicine (EPSO), University of Gothenburg, Göteborg; & Department of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö (Sweden). tommy.westerlund@mpa.se.ORCID 0000-0002-1717-9401
Sahra BarziMSc(Pharm). Department of Use of Medical Products, Medical Products Agency. Uppsala (Sweden). sahra.barzi@mpa.se.ORCID 0000-0003-4291-9739
Cecilia BernstenMSc(Pharm), PhD. Associate Professor. Department of Use of Medical Products, Medical Products Agency, Uppsala; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University. Uppsala (Sweden). cecilia.bernsten@klotblixt.se.ORCID 0000-0001-8979-5767
Medical Products Agency · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe availability of over-the-counter drugs (OTCs) has increased in Sweden since a re-regulation of the pharmacy market in 2009, through which non-pharmacy retailers became permitted to provide certain OTCs.

objectiveTo examine the adult general public's views on safety, purchasing and information channels, storage and disposal of OTCs in Sweden, three years after the re-regulation of the pharmacy market.

methodsA questionnaire study in 2012-13 in a stratified, random sample of all inhabitants in Sweden ≥ 18 years old.

resultsTotally 8,302 people (42%) answered the questionnaire. Seven percent found OTCs completely harmless regardless of how they are being used, 18% felt they should be used only on health professionals' recommendation. Differences in how OTCs are perceived were however found with regards to respondents' country of birth, family type, educational level and income. The pharmacy was still the preferred OTC drug retailer by 83% of the respondents and preferred information source by 80% Reasons for preferred retailers were primarily due to out of habit (45%), counseling provided (35%), the product range (34%) and the confidence in staff (27%). Analgesics are the most common OTCs to have at home (90%). The bathroom cabinet is the primary site for storage (42%) and 16% throw their OTC leftovers in the trash.

conclusionsThe study population does not consider OTCs as harmless regardless of how they are used, but on the other hand feels they should not be taken on health professionals' recommendation only. The pharmacy is still the preferred retailer and information source, and there is room for further improvement in the storage and disposal of OTCs. A return of OTC drug leftovers to the pharmacy should be further encouraged. Due to several limitations, great caution should however be observed when generalizing the results to the adult population of Sweden.

Indexed as

AttitudesCommunity Pharmacy ServicesGovernment RegulationHealth KnowledgeNonprescription DrugsPatient SafetyPharmaciesPracticeSurveys and QuestionnairesSweden

Identifiers

PMID28503226
PMCPMC5386627
OpenAlexW2598812188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.