Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28503178›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2017

Transcriptomic Response of Chinese Yew (

Delong Meng, Xianghua Yu, Liyuan Ma, Jin Hu, Yili Liang, Xueduan Liu, Huaqun Yin, Hongwei Liu, Xiaojia He, Diqiang Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Recent advances inFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transcriptome and MicroRNA Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Full-Length Transcriptome Analysis of Four Different Tissues ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Delong MengSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South UniversityChangsha, China.
Xianghua YuSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South UniversityChangsha, China.
Liyuan MaSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South UniversityChangsha, China.
Jin HuSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South UniversityChangsha, China.
Yili LiangSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South UniversityChangsha, China.
Xueduan LiuSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South UniversityChangsha, China.
Huaqun YinSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South UniversityChangsha, China.
Hongwei LiuSchool of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South UniversityChangsha, China.
Xiaojia HeThe Administrative Centre for China's Agenda 21Beijing, China.
Diqiang LiKey Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of State Forestry Administration, Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment, and Protection, Chinese Academy of ForestryBeijing, China.
Central South University · CNInstitute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

cold responsecold stressDE isoformsROSTaxus chinensistranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID28503178
PMCPMC5408010
OpenAlexW2609947683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.