Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28503090›Full record

ReviewCurrent genomics2017

Compounds From Celastraceae Targeting Cancer Pathways and Their Potential Application in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Review.

Camila Hernandes, Ana Maria Soares Pereira, Patricia Severino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Diels-Alder Adducts fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. A comprehensive review ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Camila HernandesaAlbert Einstein Research and Education Institute, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil; bDepartment of Biotechnology, Universidade de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Ana Maria Soares PereiraaAlbert Einstein Research and Education Institute, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil; bDepartment of Biotechnology, Universidade de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Patricia SeverinoaAlbert Einstein Research and Education Institute, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil; bDepartment of Biotechnology, Universidade de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is one of the most common cancer types worldwide. It initiates on the epithelial lining of the upper aerodigestive tract, at most instances as a consequence of tobacco and alcohol consumption. Treatment options based on conventional therapies or targeted therapies under development have limited efficacy due to multiple genetic alterations typically found in this cancer type. Natural products derived from plants often possess biological activities that may be valuable in the development of new therapeutic agents for cancer treatment. Several genera from the family Celastraceae have been studied in this context. This review reports studies on chemical constituents isolated from species from the Celastraceae family targeting cancer mechanisms studied to date. These results are then correlated with molecular characteristics of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in an attempt to identify constituents with potential application in the treatment of this complex disease at the molecular level.

Indexed as

CancerCelastraceaeHead and neck squamous cell carcinomaQuinone-methidesTargeted therapyTriterpenoids

Identifiers

PMID28503090
PMCPMC5321769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.