Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28502988›Full record

ArticleBiometrika2015

Testing Differential Networks with Applications to Detecting Gene-by-Gene Interactions.

Yin Xia, Tianxi Cai, T Tony Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrika, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Connectivity Regression.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. NETWORK DIFFERENTIAL CONNECTIVITY ANALYSIS.The annals of applied statistics · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Gaussian Bayesian network comparisons with graph ordering unknown.Computational statistics & data analysis · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Simultaneous Covariance Inference for Multimodal Integrative Analysis.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yin XiaDepartment of Statistics & Operations Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514, USA.
Tianxi CaiDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
T Tony CaiDepartment of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.

Funding

TrainingU54HG007963 · NHGRI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI KOHANE, ISAAC S., MURPHY, SHAWN N · 2014 to 2018
$18.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG007963
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Model organisms and human studies have led to increasing empirical evidence that interactions among genes contribute broadly to genetic variation of complex traits. In the presence of gene-by-gene interactions, the dimensionality of the feature space becomes extremely high relative to the sample size. This imposes a significant methodological challenge in identifying gene-by-gene interactions. In the present paper, through a Gaussian graphical model framework, we translate the problem of identifying gene-by-gene interactions associated with a binary trait

Indexed as

Differential networkfalse discovery rateGaussian graphical modelgene-by-gene interactionhighdimensional precision matrixlarge scale multiple testing

Identifiers

PMID28502988
PMCPMC5426514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.