Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28502585›Full record

ArticleBrain research2017

Frontoparietal neurostimulation modulates working memory training benefits and oscillatory synchronization.

Kevin T Jones, Dwight J Peterson, Kara J Blacker, Marian E Berryhill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Dissecting the neurocomputational bases of patch-switching.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation modulates theta response during a Go-NoGo task in traumatic brain injury.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Longitudinal indices of human cognition and brain structure.Journal of neuroscience research · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kevin T JonesDepartment of Psychology, Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 North Virginia Street, Mail Stop 296, Reno, NV 89557, United States. Electronic address: kevjones22@gmail.com.
Dwight J PetersonDepartment of Psychology, Concordia College, 901 8th St.S, Moorhead, MN 56562, United States.
Kara J BlackerDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St, 143 Ames Hall, Baltimore, MD, 21218, United States.
Marian E BerryhillDepartment of Psychology, Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 North Virginia Street, Mail Stop 296, Reno, NV 89557, United States.

Funding

Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality CoreP20GM103650 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI WEBSTER, MICHAEL A · 2012 to 2022
$20.9M
Investigating Working Memory Encoding using Frequency-Tagging of Evoked ResponseR15EY022775 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI BERRYHILL, MARIAN E, CAPLOVITZ, GIDEON PAUL · 2012 to 2012
$407k
NEI NIH HHS R15 EY022775NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is considerable interest in maintaining working memory (WM) because it is essential to accomplish most cognitive tasks, and it is correlated with fluid intelligence and ecologically valid measures of daily living. Toward this end, WM training protocols aim to improve WM capacity and extend improvements to unpracticed domains, yet success is limited. One emerging approach is to couple WM training with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). This pairing of WM training with tDCS in longitudinal designs promotes behavioral improvement and evidence of transfer of performance gains to untrained WM tasks. However, the mechanism(s) underlying tDCS-linked training benefits remain unclear. Our goal was to gain purchase on this question by recording high-density EEG before and after a weeklong WM training+tDCS study. Participants completed four sessions of frontoparietal tDCS (active anodal or sham) during which they performed a visuospatial WM change detection task. Participants who received active anodal tDCS demonstrated significant improvement on the WM task, unlike those who received sham stimulation. Importantly, this pattern was mirrored by neural correlates in spectral and phase synchrony analyses of the HD-EEG data. Notably, the behavioral interaction was echoed by interactions in frontal-posterior alpha band power, and theta and low alpha oscillations. These findings indicate that one mechanism by which paired tDCS+WM training operates is to enhance cortical efficiency and connectivity in task-relevant networks.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationBrain WavesFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermNeuropsychological TestsParietal LobePractice, PsychologicalRandom AllocationSignal Detection, PsychologicalSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionYoung AdultHD-EEGNeural oscillationstDCSWorking memory training

Identifiers

PMID28502585
PMCPMC5526229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.