Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28501967›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2017

Plaque Tissue Morphology-Based Stroke Risk Stratification Using Carotid Ultrasound: A Polling-Based PCA Learning Paradigm.

Luca Saba, Pankaj K Jain, Harman S Suri, Nobutaka Ikeda, Tadashi Araki, Bikesh K Singh, Andrew Nicolaides, Shoaib Shafique, Ajay Gupta, John R Laird and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Luca SabaDepartment of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Pankaj K JainPoint-of-Care Devices, Global Biomedical Technologies, Inc., Roseville, CA, USA.
Harman S SuriMonitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA.
Nobutaka IkedaCardiovascular Medicine, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tadashi ArakiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Bikesh K SinghDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, NIT Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Andrew NicolaidesVascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, London, England, UK.
Shoaib ShafiqueCorVasc Vascular Laboratory, 8433 Harcourt Rd #100, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Ajay GuptaBrain and Mind Research Institute and Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
John R LairdUC Davis Vascular Centre, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Jasjit S SuriMonitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA. Jasjit.Suri@atheropoint.com.
Cornell University · USNational Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPNational Institute of Technology Raipur · INToho University · JPUniversity of Cagliari · ITUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Cyprus · CYUniversity of Idaho · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe atherosclerosis disease in carotid arteries causes stenosis which in turn leads to stroke. Machine learning systems have been previously developed for plaque wall risk assessment using morphology-based characterization. The fundamental assumption in such systems is the extraction of the grayscale features of the plaque region. Even though these systems have the ability to perform risk stratification, they lack the ability to achieve higher performance due their inability to select and retain dominant features. This paper introduces a polling-based principal component analysis (PCA) strategy embedded in the machine learning framework to select and retain dominant features, resulting in superior performance. This leads to more stability and reliability. The automated system uses offline image data along with the ground truth labels to generate the parameters, which are then used to transform the online grayscale features to predict the risk of stroke. A set of sixteen grayscale plaque features is computed. Utilizing the cross-validation protocol (K = 10), and the PCA cutoff of 0.995, the machine learning system is able to achieve an accuracy of 98.55 and 98.83%corresponding to the carotidfar wall and near wall plaques, respectively. The corresponding reliability of the system was 94.56 and 95.63%, respectively. The automated system was validated against the manual risk assessment system and the precision of merit for same cross-validation settings and PCA cutoffs are 98.28 and 93.92%for the far and the near wall, respectively.PCA-embedded morphology-based plaque characterization shows a powerful strategy for risk assessment and can be adapted in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Plaque, AtheroscleroticCarotid ArteriesCarotid StenosisHumansPrincipal Component AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsStrokeUltrasonographyAtherosclerosisCarotid arteryFarMachine learningNearPerformance evaluationPrincipal component analysisStroke risk

Identifiers

PMID28501967
OpenAlexW2612685003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.