Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28501943›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2017

Protocol for the development of a Core Outcome Set (COS) for hemorrhoidal disease: an international Delphi study.

R R van Tol, J Melenhorst, C D Dirksen, L P S Stassen, S O Breukink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Patient reported outcome measure-haemorrhoidal impact and satisfaction score (PROM-HISS): Development, reliability and construct validity.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Rethinking What We Know About Hemorrhoids.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R R van TolDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands. robin.van.tol@mumc.nl.
J MelenhorstDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
C D DirksenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
L P S StassenDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
S O BreukinkDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOver the last decade, many studies were performed regarding treatment options for hemorrhoidal disease. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) should have well-defined primary and secondary outcomes. However, the reported outcome measures are numerous and diverse. The heterogeneity of outcome definition in clinical trials limits transparency and paves the way for bias. The development of a core outcome set (COS) helps minimizing this problem. A COS is an agreed minimum set of outcomes that should be measured and reported in all clinical trials of a specific disease. The aim of this project is to generate a COS regarding the outcome of treatment after hemorrhoidal disease.

methodsA Delphi study will be performed by an international steering group healthcare professionals and patients with the intention to create a standard outcome set for future clinical trials for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. First, a literature review will be conducted to establish which outcomes are used in clinical trials for hemorrhoidal disease. Secondly, both healthcare professionals and patients will participate in several consecutive rounds of online questionnaires and a face-to-face meeting to refine the content of the COS. DISCUSSION: Development of a COS for hemorrhoidal disease defines a minimum outcome-reporting standard and will improve the quality of research in the future.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueInternationalityConsensusHemorrhoidsAnalCore outcome setDelphiEndpointsHemorrhoidsProtocol

Identifiers

PMID28501943
PMCPMC5486628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.