Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28501851›Full record

ReviewOncotarget2017

Implementing liquid biopsies into clinical decision making for cancer immunotherapy.

Dagmar Quandt, Hans Dieter Zucht, Arno Amann, Anne Wulf-Goldenberg, Carl Borrebaeck, Michael Cannarile, Diether Lambrechts, Herbert Oberacher, James Garrett, Tapan Nayak and 12 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03951012 (Use Peripheral Blood Proteomics to Predict the Treatment Response and Toxicities in NSCLC Immunotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03951012 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Use Peripheral Blood Proteomics to Predict the Treatment Response and Toxicities in NSCLC Immunotherapy

TypeobservationalSponsorMuhammad FurqanRan2019 to 2023Enrolled29ConditionsNon Small Cell Lung CancerArmsBlood draw
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Microchip for Immunomagnetic Sorting of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs).Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. The association between pan-immune-inflammation value and survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Full spectrum flow cytometry and mass cytometry: A 32-marker panel comparison.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. CirculatingJournal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Dagmar QuandtInstitute of Medical Immunology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Hans Dieter ZuchtProtagen, Dortmund, Germany.
Arno AmannDepartment of Haematology and Oncology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Anne Wulf-GoldenbergExperimental Pharmacology and Oncology, Berlin-Buch GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Carl BorrebaeckCreate Health Translational Cancer Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Michael CannarileRoche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center, Munich, Germany.
Diether LambrechtsLaboratory for Translational Genetics, VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium.
Herbert OberacherInstitute of Legal Medicine and Core Facility Metabolomics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
James GarrettGlobal Drug Development, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Tapan NayakRoche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Michael KazinskiQiagen, Hilden, Germany.
Charles MassieCRUK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK.
Heidi SchwarzenbachUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Tumor Biology Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Michele MaioMedical Oncology and Immunotherapy, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Robert PrinsDepartment of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Björn WendikPerkin Elmer, Hamburg, Germany.
Richard HockettBiodesix, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Daniel EnderleExosome Diagnostics GmbH, Martinsried, Germany.
Mikkel NoerholmExosome Diagnostics GmbH, Martinsried, Germany.
Hans HendriksHendriks Pharmaceutical Consulting, Purmerend, The Netherlands.
Heinz ZwierzinaDepartment of Haematology and Oncology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Barbara SeligerInstitute of Medical Immunology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the last decade, novel immunotherapeutic strategies, in particular antibodies directed against immune checkpoint inhibitors, have revolutionized the treatment of different malignancies leading to an improved survival of patients. Identification of immune-related biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, monitoring of immune responses and selection of patients for specific cancer immunotherapies is urgently required and therefore areas of intensive research. Easily accessible samples in particular liquid biopsies (body fluids), such as blood, saliva or urine, are preferred for serial tumor biopsies.Although monitoring of immune and tumor responses prior, during and post immunotherapy has led to significant advances of patients' outcome, valid and stable prognostic biomarkers are still missing. This might be due to the limited capacity of the technologies employed, reproducibility of results as well as assay stability and validation of results. Therefore solid approaches to assess immune regulation and modulation as well as to follow up the nature of the tumor in liquid biopsies are urgently required to discover valuable and relevant biomarkers including sample preparation, timing of the collection and the type of liquid samples. This article summarizes our knowledge of the well-known liquid material in a new context as liquid biopsy and focuses on collection and assay requirements for the analysis and the technical developments that allow the implementation of different high-throughput assays to detect alterations at the genetic and immunologic level, which could be used for monitoring treatment efficiency, acquired therapy resistance mechanisms and the prognostic value of the liquid biopsies.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorAnimalsClinical Decision-MakingDiagnostic ImagingHumansImmunotherapyLiquid BiopsyNeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumorbiomarkerhigh throughput analysisimmunotherapyliquid biopsytumor

Identifiers

PMID28501851
PMCPMC5564665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.