Observational studyBMJ open2017
Haemodynamic analysis for recanalisation of intracranial aneurysms after endovascular treatment: an observational registry study in China.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02812108 (Investigation of Clinical and Hemodynamic Factors Affecting the Outcome of Intracranial Aneurysm Embolization), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Investigation of Clinical and Hemodynamic Factors Affecting the Outcome of Intracranial Aneurysm Embolization
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Significant flow velocity reduction at the intracranial aneurysm neck after endovascular treatment leads to favourable angiographic outcome: a prospective study.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2021Article
- Risk factors for periprocedural ischemic stroke following endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2021Article
- Risk Factors for Recanalization after Coil Embolization.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Does Systemic Hypertension Impact Recanalization of Coiled Aneurysms?Clinical neuroradiology · 2021Article
- Discrimination of intracranial aneurysm rupture status: patient-specific inflow boundary may not be a must-have condition in hemodynamic simulations.Neuroradiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRecanalisation of intracranial aneurysms following endovascular treatment is a major issue. Many factors, including aneurysm morphology, the method of treatment, and haemodynamics, are considered to be associated with recanalisation. However, the underlying haemodynamic mechanisms are not completely understood. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, observational, registry study for patients with intracranial aneurysms who are treated endovascularly. It will enrol 200 eligible patients. Data on morphological, haemodynamic, and treatment factors will be collected prospectively. The advanced virtual stenting technique and porous media method will be used in haemodynamic simulations. The clinical and angiographic outcomes at 6 months will be measured and analysed. This observational study will determine the haemodynamic factors that affect the recanalisation of aneurysms. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Both the study protocol and written informed consent were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Beijing Tiantan Hospital (KY2016-023-01). The results of study will be disseminated in professional printed media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02812108; Pre-results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.