Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28501679›Full record

ArticleJournal of affective disorders2017

Factor structure and longitudinal measurement invariance of PHQ-9 for specialist mental health care patients with persistent major depressive disorder: Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling.

Boliang Guo, Catherine Kaylor-Hughes, Anne Garland, Neil Nixon, Tim Sweeney, Sandra Simpson, Tim Dalgleish, Rajini Ramana, Min Yang, Richard Morriss

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Boliang GuoCLAHRC-EM, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Catherine Kaylor-HughesCLAHRC-EM, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Anne GarlandAdult Mental Health Directorate, Nottinghamshire Healthcare Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Neil NixonAdult Mental Health Directorate, Nottinghamshire Healthcare Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Tim SweeneyAdult Mental Health Directorate, Nottinghamshire Healthcare Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Sandra SimpsonNottinghamshire Healthcare Foundation Trust.
Tim DalgleishMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge.
Rajini RamanaCambridge and Peterborough Partnership NHS Foundation Trust.
Min YangWest China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, PR China.
Richard MorrissCLAHRC-EM, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: richard.morriss@nottingham.ac.uk.
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBCambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust · GBMedical Research Council · GBSichuan University · CN

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105579215Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a widely used instrument for measuring levels of depression in patients in clinical practice and academic research; its factor structure has been investigated in various samples, with limited evidence of measurement equivalence/invariance (ME/I) but not in patients with more severe depression of long duration. This study aims to explore the factor structure of the PHQ-9 and the ME/I between treatment groups over time for these patients.

methods187 secondary care patients with persistent major depressive disorder (PMDD) were recruited to a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with allocation to either a specialist depression team arm or a general mental health arm; their PHQ-9 score was measured at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Exploratory Structural Equational Modelling (ESEM) was performed to examine the factor structure for this specific patient group. ME/I between treatment arm at and across follow-up time were further explored by means of multiple-group ESEM approach using the best-fitted factor structure.

resultsA two-factor structure was evidenced (somatic and affective factor). This two-factor structure had strong factorial invariance between the treatment groups at and across follow up times. LIMITATIONS: Participants were largely white British in a RCT with 40% attrition potentially limiting the study's generalisability. Not all two-factor modelling criteria were met at every time-point.

conclusionPHQ-9 has a two-factor structure for PMDD patients, with strong measurement invariance between treatment groups at and across follow-up time, demonstrating its validity for RCTs and prospective longitudinal studies in chronic moderate to severe depression.

Indexed as

Patient Health QuestionnaireAdultDepressionFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesChronic depressionExploratory Structural Equational ModellingFactor structureMajor depressive disorderMeasurement equivalence/invariancePHQ-9

Identifiers

PMID28501679
PMCPMC6602881
OpenAlexW2613791459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.