ReviewArchives of biochemistry and biophysics2017
Combining NMR and small angle X-ray scattering for the study of biomolecular structure and dynamics.
Review in Archives of biochemistry and biophysics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural and immunogenic evaluation of silk proteins from Bombyx mori using advanced bioinformatics and deep learning for biomaterials applications.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Article
- How does NMR support SARS-CoV-2 protein-ligand interaction studies?Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Controlling Glycan Folding with Ionic Functional Groups.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Fitting high-resolution electron density maps from atomic models to solution scattering data.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- Brewing COFFEE: A sequence-specific coarse-grained energy function for simulations of DNA-protein complexes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Experiment-guided molecular simulations define a heterogeneous structural ensemble for theChemical science · 2023Article
- Generating Ensembles of Dynamic Misfolding Proteins.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- An integrative NMR-SAXS approach for structural determination of large RNAs defines the substrate-free state of a trans-cleaving Neurospora Varkud Satellite ribozyme.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Article
- Protein conformational transitions explored by a morphing approach based on normal mode analysis in internal coordinates.PloS one · 2021Article
- Ensemble description of the intrinsically disordered N-terminal domain of the Nipah virus P/V protein from combined NMR and SAXS.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Enzyme dynamics: Looking beyond a single structure.ChemCatChem · 2020Article
- Conformational flexibility in the enterovirus RNA replication platform.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) are established methods to analyze the structure and structural transitions of biological macromolecules in solution. Both methods are directly applicable to near-native macromolecular solutions and allow one to study structural responses to physical and chemical changes or ligand additions. Whereas SAXS is applied to elucidate overall structure, interactions and flexibility over a wide range of particle sizes, NMR yields atomic resolution detail for moderately sized macromolecules. NMR is arguably the most powerful technique for the experimental analysis of dynamics. The joint application of these two highly complementary techniques provides an extremely useful approach that facilitates comprehensive characterization of biomacromolecular solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.