Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28500974›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in virology2017

Ongoing developments in RSV prophylaxis: a clinician's analysis.

Fariba Rezaee, Debra T Linfield, Terri J Harford, Giovanni Piedimonte

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in virology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Electronic cigarette exposure disrupts airway epithelial barrier function and exacerbates viral infection.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Vitamin DEuropean journal of cell biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fariba RezaeePediatric Research Center and Pediatric Institute, Cleveland Clinic Children's, United States; Pathobiology Department, Lerner Research Institute, United States. Electronic address: rezaeef@ccf.org.
Debra T LinfieldPediatric Research Center and Pediatric Institute, Cleveland Clinic Children's, United States; Pathobiology Department, Lerner Research Institute, United States.
Terri J HarfordPediatric Research Center and Pediatric Institute, Cleveland Clinic Children's, United States; Pathobiology Department, Lerner Research Institute, United States.
Giovanni PiedimontePediatric Research Center and Pediatric Institute, Cleveland Clinic Children's, United States; Pathobiology Department, Lerner Research Institute, United States.
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

NEUROGENIC INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE TO RSVR01HL061007 · NHLBI · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI PIEDIMONTE, GIOVANNI · 1999 to 2022
$7.2M
Airway Epithelial Barrier Dysfunction In Response to Respiratory Syncytial VirusK08AI112781 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI REZAEE, FARIBA · 2015 to 2018
$734k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL061007NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI112781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common respiratory pathogen in infants and young children worldwide. Lower respiratory tract infection due to RSV is one of the most common causes of hospitalization for infants, especially those born premature or with chronic lung or heart disease. Furthermore, RSV infection is an important cause of morbidity in adults, particularly in the elderly and immunocompromised individuals. The acute phase of this infection is often followed by episodes of wheezing that recur for months or years and usually lead to a physician diagnosis of asthma. RSV was discovered more than 50 years ago, and despite extensive research to identify pharmacological therapies, the most effective management of this infection remains supportive care. The trial of a formalin-inactivated RSV vaccine in the 1960s resulted in priming the severe illness upon natural infection. Currently, Palivizumab is the only available option for RSV prophylaxis, and because of restricted clinical benefits and high costs, it has been limited to a group of high-risk infants. There are several ongoing trials in preclinical, Phase-I, Phase-II, or Phase-III clinical stages for RSV vaccine development based on various strategies. Here we review the existing available prophylactic options, the current stages of RSV vaccine clinical trials, different strategies, and major hurdles in the development of an effective RSV vaccine.

Indexed as

Pre-Exposure ProphylaxisRespiratory Syncytial Virus VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntiviral AgentsClinical Trials as TopicHospitalizationHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineInfantMicePalivizumabRespiratory Syncytial Virus, HumanRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsRisk FactorsVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntiviral AgentsPalivizumabRespiratory Syncytial Virus VaccinesVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID28500974
PMCPMC5541395
OpenAlexW2613066560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.