Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28500580›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2018

Is right colectomy a complete learning procedure for a robotic surgical program?

Paolo Raimondi, Francesco Marchegiani, Massimo Cieri, Annadomenica Cichella, Roberto Cotellese, Paolo Innocenti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Learning Curve in Robotic Colorectal Surgery.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Minimally invasive colorectal surgery learning curve.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The role of robotics in colorectal surgery.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paolo RaimondiDepartment of Medical and Oral Sciences and Biotechnologies, "G.d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy. paolo.rai@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7138-8514
Francesco MarchegianiDivision of General Surgery, "SS. Annunziata Hospital", Chieti, Italy.
Massimo CieriDivision of General Surgery, "SS. Annunziata Hospital", Chieti, Italy.
Annadomenica CichellaDivision of General Surgery, "SS. Annunziata Hospital", Chieti, Italy.
Roberto CotelleseDepartment of Medical and Oral Sciences and Biotechnologies, "G.d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy.
Paolo InnocentiDepartment of Medical and Oral Sciences and Biotechnologies, "G.d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy.
Ospedale SS. Annunziata · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study analyses the utility of right colectomy as a learning procedure at the beginning of a robotic surgical program. The hypothesis is that right colectomy contains all the technical steps necessary to acquire basic abilities in robotics surgery. The first 23 consecutive robotic right colectomy performed at the beginning of a robotic program were analysed. All surgical times were recorded in the operating room and second checked on a dedicated video-database. Specific robotic times were analysed using CUSUM method to evaluate the learning curve. CUSUM-derived learning phases were compared. Fourteen males and nine females with a mean age of 68.7 (46-84) underwent robotic right colectomy. The mean overall time was 265.3 min (180-320 min), docking time was 7 min (5-12 min), console time was 205.9 min (145-260 min), and anastomotic time was 43.6 (25-60 min). CUSUM analyses identified two learning phases: "starting phase" and "consolidation phase". Interphase comparison confirmed the significant (p < 0.05) differences between the two phases. Robotic technology facilitates the training process in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. At the beginning of the learning curve, right colectomy could represent a complete procedure to be proficient in robotic colorectal surgery.

Indexed as

Learning CurveAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Loss, SurgicalColectomyColonic NeoplasmsEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRobotic Surgical ProceduresCUSUMLearning curveRight colectomyRobotic surgerySurgical educationSurgical training

Identifiers

PMID28500580
OpenAlexW2614072987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.