Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28500506›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017

A controlled comparison of the BacT/ALERT® 3D and VIRTUO™ microbial detection systems.

H Totty, M Ullery, J Spontak, J Viray, M Adamik, B Katzin, W M Dunne, P Deol

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effect of delayed entry on performance of the BACT/ALERT FAN PLUS bottles in the BACT/ALERT VIRTUO blood culture system.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

H TottyR&D Microbiology, bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC, USA.
M UlleryBiomathematics and Knowledge Engineering, bioMérieux, Inc., Hazelwood, MO, USA.
J SpontakR&D Microbiology, bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC, USA.
J VirayR&D Microbiology, bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC, USA.
M AdamikR&D Microbiology, bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC, USA.
B KatzinR&D Microbiology, bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC, USA.
W M DunneScientific Office, bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC, USA.
P DeolR&D Microbiology, bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC, USA. Parampal.Deol@biomerieux.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The performance of the next-generation BacT/ALERT® VIRTUO™ Microbial Detection System (VIRTUO™, bioMérieux Inc., Hazelwood, MO) was compared to the BacT/ALERT® 3D Microbial Detection System (3D, bioMérieux Inc., Durham, NC) using BacT/ALERT® FA Plus (FA Plus), BacT/ALERT® PF Plus (PF Plus), BacT/ALERT® FN Plus (FN Plus), BacT/ALERT® Standard Aerobic (SA), and BacT/ALERT® Standard Anaerobic (SN) blood culture bottles (bioMérieux Inc., Durham, NC). A seeded limit of detection (LoD) study was performed for each bottle type in both systems. The LoD studies demonstrated that both systems were capable of detecting organisms at nearly identical levels [<10 colony-forming units (CFU) per bottle], with no significant difference. Following LoD determination, a seeded study was performed to compare the time to detection (TTD) between the systems using a panel of clinically relevant microorganisms inoculated at or near the LoD with 0, 4, or 10 mL of healthy human blood. VIRTUO™ exhibited a faster TTD by an average of 3.5 h, as well as demonstrated a significantly improved detection rate of 99.9% compared to 98.8% with 3D (p-value <0.05).

Indexed as

Automation, LaboratoryBlood CultureHumansMicrobiological TechniquesSensitivity and SpecificitySepsisBlood Culture BottleBlood Sample VolumeCulture BottleFusobacterium NucleatumImprove Detection Rate

Identifiers

PMID28500506
PMCPMC5602088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.