Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28500490›Full record

Trial reportStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2017

Effects of definitive and salvage radiotherapy on the distribution of lymphocyte subpopulations in prostate cancer patients.

Eva K Sage, Thomas E Schmid, Hans Geinitz, Mathias Gehrmann, Michael Sedelmayr, Marciana N Duma, Stephanie E Combs, Gabriele Multhoff

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eva K SageDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Thomas E SchmidDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Hans GeinitzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern and Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
Mathias GehrmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Michael SedelmayrDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Marciana N DumaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Stephanie E CombsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Gabriele MulthoffDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Munich, Germany. Gabriele.multhoff@tum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiotherapy (RT) is an established treatment for patients with primary and recurrent prostate cancer. Herein, the effects of definitive and salvage RT on the composition of lymphocyte subpopulations were investigated in patients with prostate cancer to study potential immune effects. PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 33 prostate cancer patients were treated with definitive (n = 10) or salvage RT (n = 23) after biochemical relapse. The absolute number of lymphocytes and the distribution of lymphocyte subpopulations were analyzed by multiparameter flow cytometry before RT, at the end of RT, and in the follow-up period.

resultsAbsolute lymphocyte counts decreased significantly after RT in both patient groups and a significant drop was observed in the percentage of B cells directly after RT from 10.1 ± 1.3 to 6.0 ± 0.7% in patients with definitive RT and from 9.2 ± 0.8 to 5.8 ± 0.7% in patients with salvage RT. In contrast, the percentages of T and natural killer (NK) cells remained unaltered directly after RT in both patient groups. However, 1 year after RT, the percentage of CD3

conclusionDefinitive and salvage RT exert similar effects on the composition of lymphocyte subpopulations in prostate cancer patients. Total lymphocyte counts are lower in both patient groups compared to healthy controls and further decreased after RT. B cells are more sensitive to definitive and salvage RT than T and NK cells.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumansLymphocyte CountLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy DosageReproducibility of ResultsSalvage TherapySensitivity and SpecificityTreatment OutcomeAnti-tumor ImmunityB lymphocytesNatural killer cellsProstatectomyT lymphocytes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.