Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28500486›Full record

ReviewInsights into imaging2017

Tips and tricks for a safe and effective image-guided percutaneous renal tumour ablation.

Giovanni Mauri, L Nicosia, G M Varano, G Bonomo, P Della Vigna, L Monfardini, F Orsi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insights into imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Role of Fusion Imaging in Image-Guided Thermal Ablations.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Percutaneous Image-guided Thermal Ablation for Renal Cell Carcinoma.Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Giovanni MauriDivisione di Radiologia Interventistica, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy. vanni.mauri@gmail.com.
L NicosiaScuola di specializzazione in Radiodiagnostica, Università degli studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, Milan, Italy.
G M VaranoDivisione di Radiologia Interventistica, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
G BonomoDivisione di Radiologia Interventistica, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
P Della VignaDivisione di Radiologia Interventistica, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
L MonfardiniDipartimento di radiologia e diagnostica per immagini, Poliambulazna di Brescia, Via Leonida Bissolati 57, Brescia, Italy.
F OrsiDivisione di Radiologia Interventistica, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image-guide thermal ablations are nowadays increasingly used to provide a minimally invasive treatment to patients with renal tumours, with reported good clinical results and low complications rate. Different ablative techniques can be applied, each with some advantages and disadvantages according to the clinical situation. Moreover, percutaneous ablation of renal tumours might be complex in cases where there is limited access for image guidance or a close proximity to critical structures, which can be unintentionally injured during treatment. In the present paper we offer an overview of the most commonly used ablative techniques and of the most important manoeuvres that can be applied to enhance the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous image-guided renal ablation. Emphasis is given to the different technical aspects of cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, and microwave ablation, on the ideal operating room setting, optimal image guidance, application of fusion imaging and virtual navigation, and contrast enhanced ultrasound in the guidance and monitoring of the procedure. Moreover, a series of protective manoeuvre that can be used to avoid damage to surrounding sensitive structures is presented. A selection of cases of image-guided thermal ablation of renal tumours in which the discussed technique were used is presented and illustrated. TEACHING POINTS: • Cryoablation, radiofrequency and microwave ablation have different advantages and disadvantages. • US, CT, fusion imaging, and CEUS increase an effective image-guidance. • Different patient positioning and external compression may increase procedure feasibility. • Hydrodissection and gas insufflation are useful to displace surrounding critical structures. • Cold pyeloperfusion can reduce the thermal damage to the collecting system.

Indexed as

Image guidanceImage-guided tumour ablationProtective manoeuvresRenal ablationRenal tumours

Identifiers

PMID28500486
PMCPMC5438321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.