Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28499548›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2017

Mortality risks associated with emergency admissions during weekends and public holidays: an analysis of electronic health records.

A Sarah Walker, Amy Mason, T Phuong Quan, Nicola J Fawcett, Peter Watkinson, Martin Llewelyn, Nicole Stoesser, John Finney, Jim Davies, David H Wyllie and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

A Sarah WalkerOxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: sarah.walker@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Amy MasonOxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
T Phuong QuanOxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Nicola J FawcettOxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Peter WatkinsonOxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Martin LlewelynOxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK.
Nicole StoesserOxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
John FinneyOxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Jim DaviesOxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
David H WyllieOxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; National Infection Service, Public Health England, Colindale, London, UK.
Derrick W CrookOxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; National Infection Service, Public Health England, Colindale, London, UK.
Tim E A PetoOxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M003736/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeekend hospital admission is associated with increased mortality, but the contributions of varying illness severity and admission time to this weekend effect remain unexplored.

methodsWe analysed unselected emergency admissions to four Oxford University National Health Service hospitals in the UK from Jan 1, 2006, to Dec 31, 2014. The primary outcome was death within 30 days of admission (in or out of hospital), analysed using Cox models measuring time from admission. The primary exposure was day of the week of admission. We adjusted for multiple confounders including demographics, comorbidities, and admission characteristics, incorporating non-linearity and interactions. Models then considered the effect of adjusting for 15 common haematology and biochemistry test results or proxies for hospital workload.

findings257 596 individuals underwent 503 938 emergency admissions. 18 313 (4·7%) patients admitted as weekday energency admissions and 6070 (5·1%) patients admitted as weekend emergency admissions died within 30 days (p<0·0001). 9347 individuals underwent 9707 emergency admissions on public holidays. 559 (5·8%) died within 30 days (p<0·0001 vs weekday). 15 routine haematology and biochemistry test results were highly prognostic for mortality. In 271 465 (53·9%) admissions with complete data, adjustment for test results explained 33% (95% CI 21 to 70) of the excess mortality associated with emergency admission on Saturdays compared with Wednesdays, 52% (lower 95% CI 34) on Sundays, and 87% (lower 95% CI 45) on public holidays after adjustment for standard patient characteristics. Excess mortality was predominantly restricted to admissions between 1100 h and 1500 h (p

interpretationAdjustment for routine test results substantially reduced excess mortality associated with emergency admission at weekends and public holidays. Adjustment for patient-level factors not available in our study might further reduce the residual excess mortality, particularly as this clustered around midday at weekends. Hospital workload was not associated with mortality. Together, these findings suggest that the weekend effect arises from patient-level differences at admission rather than reduced hospital staffing or services.

fundingNIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre.

Indexed as

MortalityAdultAfter-Hours CareAgedAged, 80 and overDiagnosis-Related GroupsElectronic Health RecordsEmergenciesEnglandFemaleHolidaysHospitalizationHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID28499548
PMCPMC5494289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.