ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2017
Chromosomal abnormalities: subgroup analysis by maternal age and perinatal features in zhejiang province of China, 2011-2015.
Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utility of Non-Invasive Prenatal Test (NIPT) as a Screening Tool for Fetal Aneuploidy in a Family Medicine Setting in Saudi Arabia.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Influence of parental age on chromosomal abnormalities in PGT-A embryos: exponentially increasing in the mother and completely null in the father.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of Quantitative Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction as a Substitute or Complement to Conventional Karyotyping for Prenatal Diagnosis.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2025Article
- Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for birth defects: a study from population-based surveillance data.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Maternal age and the risk of fetal aneuploidy: A nationwide cohort study of more than 500 000 singleton pregnancies in Denmark from 2008 to 2017.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024Article
- Evaluation of chromosomal abnormalities in the postnatal cohort: A single-center study on 14,242 patients.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2024Article
- The trend in delayed childbearing and its potential consequences on pregnancy outcomes: a single center 9-years retrospective cohort study in Hubei, China.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Observational
- Analysis of prenatal diagnosis before and after implementation of the two-child policy in northeastern China.Medicine · 2019Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecently, the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities (CA) increased as the increasing proportion of mothers with advanced age. We aimed to explore the prevalence of CA in relation to maternal age and perinatal features.
methodsA retrospective study was performed based on provincial birth defects surveillance data. The relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to calculate maternal age-specific rates of CA. Socio-demographic characteristics of mothers and perinatal features were listed.
resultsThe total prevalence of CA was 6.38 per 10,000 births, which increased per 10,000 births linearly from 4.02 in 2011 to 9.13 in 2015 (x
conclusionsThe prevalence of CA increased as maternal age increased. Cases with CA were associated with other congenital defects and high mortality risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.