Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28499021›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2017

Protein-only RNase P function in Escherichia coli: viability, processing defects and differences between PRORP isoenzymes.

Markus Gößringer, Marcus Lechner, Nadia Brillante, Christoph Weber, Walter Rossmanith, Roland K Hartmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Involvement ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The cellular landscape of mid-size noncoding RNA.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2019
    Review
  11. Bacterial ribonucleases and their roles in RNA metabolism.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Minimal and RNA-free RNase P inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Markus GößringerInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipps-University Marburg, Marbacher Weg 6, 35037 Marburg, Germany.
Marcus LechnerInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipps-University Marburg, Marbacher Weg 6, 35037 Marburg, Germany.
Nadia BrillanteCenter for Anatomy & Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Straße 13, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Christoph WeberCenter for Anatomy & Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Straße 13, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Walter RossmanithCenter for Anatomy & Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Straße 13, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Roland K HartmannInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipps-University Marburg, Marbacher Weg 6, 35037 Marburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The RNase P family comprises structurally diverse endoribonucleases ranging from complex ribonucleoproteins to single polypeptides. We show that the organellar (AtPRORP1) and the two nuclear (AtPRORP2,3) single-polypeptide RNase P isoenzymes from Arabidopsis thaliana confer viability to Escherichia coli cells with a lethal knockdown of its endogenous RNA-based RNase P. RNA-Seq revealed that AtPRORP1, compared with bacterial RNase P or AtPRORP3, cleaves several precursor tRNAs (pre-tRNAs) aberrantly in E. coli. Aberrant cleavage by AtPRORP1 was mainly observed for pre-tRNAs that can form short acceptor-stem extensions involving G:C base pairs, including tRNAAsp(GUC), tRNASer(CGA) and tRNAHis. However, both AtPRORP1 and 3 were defective in processing of E. coli pre-tRNASec carrying an acceptor stem expanded by three G:C base pairs. Instead, pre-tRNASec was degraded, suggesting that tRNASec is dispensable for E. coli under laboratory conditions. AtPRORP1, 2 and 3 are also essentially unable to process the primary transcript of 4.5S RNA, a hairpin-like non-tRNA substrate processed by E. coli RNase P, indicating that PRORP enzymes have a narrower, more tRNA-centric substrate spectrum than bacterial RNA-based RNase P enzymes. The cells' viability also suggests that the essential function of the signal recognition particle can be maintained with a 5΄-extended 4.5S RNA.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsBase PairingBase SequenceEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGenetic Complementation TestMicrobial ViabilityNucleic Acid ConformationRibonuclease PRNA, BacterialRNA PrecursorsRNA, Transfer, AspRNA, Transfer, HisRNA, Transfer, Ser4.5S RNAArabidopsis ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsPRORP1 protein, ArabidopsisPRORP2 protein, ArabidopsisPRORP3 protein, ArabidopsisRibonuclease PRNA, BacterialRNA PrecursorsRNA, Transfer, AspRNA, Transfer, HisRNA, Transfer, Ser

Identifiers

PMID28499021
PMCPMC5499578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.