Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28498868›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

A Drosophila model for developmental nicotine exposure.

Norma Andrea Velazquez-Ulloa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Neurotransmitters Involved inFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  9. HCN2 Channel-Induced Rescue of Brain TeratogenesisFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Fly's Eye View of Natural and Drug Reward.Frontiers in physiology · 2018
    Review
  14. Neural plasticity · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Norma Andrea Velazquez-UlloaBiology Department, Lewis & Clark College, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5616-2103

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the known health risks of tobacco smoking, many people including pregnant women continue smoking. The effects of developmental nicotine exposure are known, but the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. Drosophila melanogaster is a model organism that can be used for uncovering genetic and molecular mechanisms for drugs of abuse. Here I show that Drosophila can be a model to elucidate the mechanisms for nicotine's effects on a developing organism. Drosophila reared on nicotine food display developmental and behavioral effects similar to those in mammals including decreased survival and weight, increased developmental time, and decreased sensitivity to acute nicotine and ethanol. The Drosophila nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit alpha 7 (Dα7) mediates some of these effects. A novel role for Dα7 on ethanol sedation in Drosophila is also shown. Future research taking advantage of the genetic and molecular tools for Drosophila will allow additional discovery of the mechanisms behind the effects of nicotine during development.

Indexed as

AnimalsBody WeightDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEthanolNicotinePolymerase Chain ReactionReceptors, NicotinicDrosophila ProteinsEthanolNicotinenicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha-subunits, DrosophilaReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID28498868
PMCPMC5428972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.